Research priority setting in childhood cancer: An integrative review

Identifying research priorities for childhood cancer through lived experiences is an evolving process that supports efficient and relevant research. This review identifies and synthesises research priority setting methods and research priorities in childhood cancer. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL for studies published between 2014 and 2026 that elicited research priorities for childhood cancer. From 1892, screened titles, 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies (n = 12, 80%) addressed childhood cancer broadly, while three focused on specific aspects. All studies employed multi-phase approaches to collect and prioritise research questions from various stakeholders. Sampling varied: ten studies engaged multiple stakeholder groups, four included only healthcare professionals, and one focused exclusively on young people. None reported implementation or evaluation aspects of the identified priorities. We categorised 124 reported priorities into seven themes, with most concentrated on cancer survivorship and outcomes research (n = 72, 58.1%). While systematic methods are increasingly adopted, gaps remain in meaningful engagement of young people and in strategies to assess uptake and translation of priorities into actionable research. Future prioritisation efforts should adopt inclusive frameworks that promote meaningful stakeholder engagement and develop strategies to assess the uptake, translation, and impact of identified priorities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Child Health Care
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13674935261500850
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research priority setting in childhood cancer: An integrative review

Norah Elvidge, Natalie Bradford, Alison Pauline Bowers, Melanie L. Rolfe et al.
Journal of Child Health Care
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

Research priority setting in childhood cancer: An integrative review

Norah Elvidge, Natalie Bradford, Alison Pauline Bowers, Melanie L. Rolfe, Eden G. Robertson, Joanne Cummings, Gayani De Silva
article en

Abstract

Identifying research priorities for childhood cancer through lived experiences is an evolving process that supports efficient and relevant research. This review identifies and synthesises research priority setting methods and research priorities in childhood cancer. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL for studies published between 2014 and 2026 that elicited research priorities for childhood cancer. From 1892, screened titles, 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies (n = 12, 80%) addressed childhood cancer broadly, while three focused on specific aspects. All studies employed multi-phase approaches to collect and prioritise research questions from various stakeholders. Sampling varied: ten studies engaged multiple stakeholder groups, four included only healthcare professionals, and one focused exclusively on young people. None reported implementation or evaluation aspects of the identified priorities. We categorised 124 reported priorities into seven themes, with most concentrated on cancer survivorship and outcomes research (n = 72, 58.1%). While systematic methods are increasingly adopted, gaps remain in meaningful engagement of young people and in strategies to assess uptake and translation of priorities into actionable research. Future prioritisation efforts should adopt inclusive frameworks that promote meaningful stakeholder engagement and develop strategies to assess the uptake, translation, and impact of identified priorities.

Journal of Child Health Care
Queensland University of Technology (AU), Cancer Council Queensland (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), Sydney Children's Hospital (AU), Sydney Children’s Hospitals Network (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon