Insertable Cardiac Monitoring in Pediatric Patients: A Real‐World Single‐Center Experience With a New‐Generation Device

BACKGROUND: Insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) are increasingly used in pediatric patients, yet data on new-generation devices remain limited. The aim of this retrospective study was to describe a single-center real-world experience with a new-generation ICM in pediatric patients, focusing on procedural feasibility, sensing performance, transmission burden, and user experience. METHODS: Consecutive patients aged ≤18 years undergoing LUX-Dx ICM implantation between 2023 and 2025 were included. Procedural characteristics, sensing parameters, transmission patterns, diagnostic yield, reprogramming strategies, and patient/caregiver-reported experience were analyzed. Data are reported as median (25th-75th percentile) or mean ± standard deviation. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients underwent ICM implantation. Procedures were brief (6 ± 2 min) and complication-free. Electrical parameters were satisfactory and stable at discharge. Follow-up was 18 (6-23) months. A median of 2.7 transmissions per patient-month were received, of which 55% were alerts. Time from arrhythmia detection to transmission was 15 (3-21) hours. The number of episodes per patient was 4.8 (3.1-15.9) per month, with substantial inter-patient variability and bradycardia being the most frequent detection (80%). A diagnostic conclusion was reached in 79% of patients (positive: 45%, negative: 34%) at a median of 3 months. Reprogramming was performed in 90% of patients, mainly remotely (77%), and was predominantly directed toward reducing detection sensitivity. Patient and caregiver acceptance of remote monitoring was high. CONCLUSIONS: In pediatric patients, new-generation ICM implantation was safe, well tolerated, and associated with stable sensing performance. Remote monitoring and reprogramming enabled timely diagnosis and individualized optimization, supporting the clinical utility of contemporary ICMs in this population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.70485
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Insertable Cardiac Monitoring in Pediatric Patients: A Real‐World Single‐Center Experience With a New‐Generation Device

Marta Unolt, Ilaria Tamburri, Ilaria Cazzoli, Fabrizio Drago et al.
3 links
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
article

Insertable Cardiac Monitoring in Pediatric Patients: A Real‐World Single‐Center Experience With a New‐Generation Device

Marta Unolt, Ilaria Tamburri, Ilaria Cazzoli, Fabrizio Drago, Daniela Righi, Giacomo Silvetti, Luigina Porco, Sergio Valsecchi, Fabio Anselmo Saputo, Monica Campari, Cristina Raimondo, Massimo Stefano Silvetti
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) are increasingly used in pediatric patients, yet data on new-generation devices remain limited. The aim of this retrospective study was to describe a single-center real-world experience with a new-generation ICM in pediatric patients, focusing on procedural feasibility, sensing performance, transmission burden, and user experience. METHODS: Consecutive patients aged ≤18 years undergoing LUX-Dx ICM implantation between 2023 and 2025 were included. Procedural characteristics, sensing parameters, transmission patterns, diagnostic yield, reprogramming strategies, and patient/caregiver-reported experience were analyzed. Data are reported as median (25th-75th percentile) or mean ± standard deviation. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients underwent ICM implantation. Procedures were brief (6 ± 2 min) and complication-free. Electrical parameters were satisfactory and stable at discharge. Follow-up was 18 (6-23) months. A median of 2.7 transmissions per patient-month were received, of which 55% were alerts. Time from arrhythmia detection to transmission was 15 (3-21) hours. The number of episodes per patient was 4.8 (3.1-15.9) per month, with substantial inter-patient variability and bradycardia being the most frequent detection (80%). A diagnostic conclusion was reached in 79% of patients (positive: 45%, negative: 34%) at a median of 3 months. Reprogramming was performed in 90% of patients, mainly remotely (77%), and was predominantly directed toward reducing detection sensitivity. Patient and caregiver acceptance of remote monitoring was high. CONCLUSIONS: In pediatric patients, new-generation ICM implantation was safe, well tolerated, and associated with stable sensing performance. Remote monitoring and reprogramming enabled timely diagnosis and individualized optimization, supporting the clinical utility of contemporary ICMs in this population.

Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Boston Scientific (United States) (US), Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon