Ultra-processed food indices and component food groups in relation to incident type 2 diabetes and cardiometabolic multimorbidity: a prospective cohort study

Broad ultra-processed food (UPF) measures combine product groups that may differ in cardiometabolic relevance. This study examined questionnaire-observable processing-related food groups, sweet-tasting beverage subtypes and dietary difference indices in relation to type 2 diabetes and cardiometabolic multimorbidity. This prospective cohort analysis included 188,405 UK Biobank participants with Oxford WebQ dietary data. A study-specific UPF-like food-group index comprised processed meat, sweet snacks, savoury snacks, sweet-tasting beverages and ready/fried foods. Cox models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) per 1-standard-deviation higher score for incident type 2 diabetes and cardiometabolic multimorbidity, with sequential adjustment for demographic factors, conventional nutrients, body mass index and a nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) biomarker score. Median follow-up was 14.4 years for type 2 diabetes and 14.3 years for cardiometabolic multimorbidity. The total index was associated with type 2 diabetes in the base model (HR 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17–1.22) and cardiometabolic multimorbidity (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.11–1.15). After nutrient adjustment, corresponding HRs were 1.18 (95% CI 1.15–1.20) and 1.11 (95% CI 1.09–1.13); after adding body mass index, 1.09 (95% CI 1.06–1.11) and 1.06 (95% CI 1.04–1.08). Additional NMR adjustment yielded HRs of 1.07 (95% CI 1.05–1.10) and 1.05 (95% CI 1.03–1.07). In nutrient- and body-mass-index-adjusted models, the sweet-tasting beverage subtype composite was associated with type 2 diabetes (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.10–1.15) and cardiometabolic multimorbidity (HR 1.08, 95% CI 1.07–1.10). Savoury snacks showed smaller positive associations. The minimally processed plant-food minus UPF-like difference index was inversely associated with both outcomes (type 2 diabetes HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.90–0.94; cardiometabolic multimorbidity HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.93–0.96). Although the overall UPF-like dietary index was associated with incident type 2 diabetes and cardiometabolic multimorbidity, the observed associations appeared to be driven primarily by sweet-tasting beverages and, to a lesser extent, savoury snacks, with considerably weaker evidence for the remaining food groups. Reporting component food groups alongside UPF-related indices may distinguish food-specific associations from broader dietary patterns for understanding cardiometabolic risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medicine
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-026-05353-2
Primary Topic
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ultra-processed food indices and component food groups in relation to incident type 2 diabetes and cardiometabolic multimorbidity: a prospective cohort study

Linjiang Wei, Ying Han, Yuelong Ji, Ya Fang
3 links
BMC Medicine
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
article

Ultra-processed food indices and component food groups in relation to incident type 2 diabetes and cardiometabolic multimorbidity: a prospective cohort study

Linjiang Wei, Ying Han, Yuelong Ji, Ya Fang
article en

Abstract

Broad ultra-processed food (UPF) measures combine product groups that may differ in cardiometabolic relevance. This study examined questionnaire-observable processing-related food groups, sweet-tasting beverage subtypes and dietary difference indices in relation to type 2 diabetes and cardiometabolic multimorbidity. This prospective cohort analysis included 188,405 UK Biobank participants with Oxford WebQ dietary data. A study-specific UPF-like food-group index comprised processed meat, sweet snacks, savoury snacks, sweet-tasting beverages and ready/fried foods. Cox models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) per 1-standard-deviation higher score for incident type 2 diabetes and cardiometabolic multimorbidity, with sequential adjustment for demographic factors, conventional nutrients, body mass index and a nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) biomarker score. Median follow-up was 14.4 years for type 2 diabetes and 14.3 years for cardiometabolic multimorbidity. The total index was associated with type 2 diabetes in the base model (HR 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17–1.22) and cardiometabolic multimorbidity (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.11–1.15). After nutrient adjustment, corresponding HRs were 1.18 (95% CI 1.15–1.20) and 1.11 (95% CI 1.09–1.13); after adding body mass index, 1.09 (95% CI 1.06–1.11) and 1.06 (95% CI 1.04–1.08). Additional NMR adjustment yielded HRs of 1.07 (95% CI 1.05–1.10) and 1.05 (95% CI 1.03–1.07). In nutrient- and body-mass-index-adjusted models, the sweet-tasting beverage subtype composite was associated with type 2 diabetes (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.10–1.15) and cardiometabolic multimorbidity (HR 1.08, 95% CI 1.07–1.10). Savoury snacks showed smaller positive associations. The minimally processed plant-food minus UPF-like difference index was inversely associated with both outcomes (type 2 diabetes HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.90–0.94; cardiometabolic multimorbidity HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.93–0.96). Although the overall UPF-like dietary index was associated with incident type 2 diabetes and cardiometabolic multimorbidity, the observed associations appeared to be driven primarily by sweet-tasting beverages and, to a lesser extent, savoury snacks, with considerably weaker evidence for the remaining food groups. Reporting component food groups alongside UPF-related indices may distinguish food-specific associations from broader dietary patterns for understanding cardiometabolic risk.

BMC Medicine
Xiamen University (CN), Peking University (CN), Wenzhou Medical University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Key Technologies Research and Development Program, National Social Science Fund of China
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon