Polysaccharide Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting: A Guide to Translation

Polysaccharide-based hydrogels offer versatile platforms for three-dimensional bioprinting, but translation requires coordinated assessment of formulation, processing, and biological performance. This narrative review connects backbone chemistry and functionalization with rheology, crosslinking, printing modality, cellular responses, and manufacturing requirements. It examines alginate, hyaluronic acid, chitosan, cellulose derivatives, gellan gum, and complementary polysaccharides, distinguishing cell-laden bioinks from acellular biomaterial inks and supporting materials. A study-specific framework separates material feasibility, cell-laden printing, functional in vitro outcomes, preclinical evaluation, and preliminary human feasibility without assigning maturity scores to entire material families. Print fidelity and cellular remodeling impose competing requirements whose balance is formulation- and application-dependent. Dual or sequential crosslinking, dynamic networks, and support-bath printing provide complementary approaches rather than a universal solution. Inconsistent reporting limits cross-study comparison; a minimum reporting set is therefore proposed. Sterilization, raw-material variability, quality control, long-term safety, and regulatory classification are considered alongside formulation design. Future priorities include tissue-appropriate viscoelasticity, granular architectures, hierarchical vascularization, and reproducible data-driven optimization. Clinical translation will require stronger links between manufacturing reproducibility and sustained biological function, rather than printing accuracy alone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polysaccharides
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/polysaccharides7040121
Primary Topic
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Polysaccharide Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting: A Guide to Translation

R. Cristescu, Anita Ioana Vișan, Adrian Bibiș, Alexandru Paraschiv et al.
2 links
Polysaccharides
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
article

Polysaccharide Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting: A Guide to Translation

R. Cristescu, Anita Ioana Vișan, Adrian Bibiș, Alexandru Paraschiv, Nicolae Dan Batalu
article en

Abstract

Polysaccharide-based hydrogels offer versatile platforms for three-dimensional bioprinting, but translation requires coordinated assessment of formulation, processing, and biological performance. This narrative review connects backbone chemistry and functionalization with rheology, crosslinking, printing modality, cellular responses, and manufacturing requirements. It examines alginate, hyaluronic acid, chitosan, cellulose derivatives, gellan gum, and complementary polysaccharides, distinguishing cell-laden bioinks from acellular biomaterial inks and supporting materials. A study-specific framework separates material feasibility, cell-laden printing, functional in vitro outcomes, preclinical evaluation, and preliminary human feasibility without assigning maturity scores to entire material families. Print fidelity and cellular remodeling impose competing requirements whose balance is formulation- and application-dependent. Dual or sequential crosslinking, dynamic networks, and support-bath printing provide complementary approaches rather than a universal solution. Inconsistent reporting limits cross-study comparison; a minimum reporting set is therefore proposed. Sterilization, raw-material variability, quality control, long-term safety, and regulatory classification are considered alongside formulation design. Future priorities include tissue-appropriate viscoelasticity, granular architectures, hierarchical vascularization, and reproducible data-driven optimization. Clinical translation will require stronger links between manufacturing reproducibility and sustained biological function, rather than printing accuracy alone.

PolysaccharidesVol. 7(4)
University of Bucharest (RO), National Institute for Laser Plasma and Radiation Physics (RO), Romanian Research and Development Institute for Gas Turbines (RO), Universitatea Națională de Știință și Tehnologie Politehnica București (RO)
European Regional Development Fund, Research Institute, University of Bucharest
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon