Social isolation in motion: How socioeconomic segregation in everyday mobility varies by neighborhood racial-ethnic composition in U.S. cities

Recent scholarship finds that socioeconomic (dis)advantage in urban neighborhoods’ routine mobility networks—the neighborhoods their residents visit and receive visits from—predicts their vitality. Mobility-based (dis)advantage is correlated with, but conceptually distinct from, the socioeconomic status of a neighborhood’s residents. Thus, residential and mobility-based disadvantage can lead to distinct or compounding inequalities. This paper builds on Wilson’s social isolation framework to analyze how mobility-based disadvantage is unequally distributed by neighborhood racial-ethnic composition in the United States’ 100 most populous cities and their commuting zones. Majority-Black and majority-Hispanic neighborhoods experience heightened levels of mobility-based disadvantage, which deepens well-known disparities with majority-white neighborhoods based on residents’ socioeconomic statuses. Generally, mobility disadvantage compounds inequalities based on residential disadvantage, but for some Black and Hispanic neighborhoods with relatively low residential disadvantage, mobility disadvantage is a distinct form of inequality. The extent of these inequalities varies by urban form, with white spatial clustering and residential segregation by income as salient moderators. Isolation in structural neighborhood networks emerges as a clear feature of racial-ethnic inequality, though that one varies between cities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban Studies
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980261493239
Primary Topic
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social isolation in motion: How socioeconomic segregation in everyday mobility varies by neighborhood racial-ethnic composition in U.S. cities

Brian L. Levy
3 links
Urban Studies
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
article

Social isolation in motion: How socioeconomic segregation in everyday mobility varies by neighborhood racial-ethnic composition in U.S. cities

Brian L. Levy
article en

Abstract

Recent scholarship finds that socioeconomic (dis)advantage in urban neighborhoods’ routine mobility networks—the neighborhoods their residents visit and receive visits from—predicts their vitality. Mobility-based (dis)advantage is correlated with, but conceptually distinct from, the socioeconomic status of a neighborhood’s residents. Thus, residential and mobility-based disadvantage can lead to distinct or compounding inequalities. This paper builds on Wilson’s social isolation framework to analyze how mobility-based disadvantage is unequally distributed by neighborhood racial-ethnic composition in the United States’ 100 most populous cities and their commuting zones. Majority-Black and majority-Hispanic neighborhoods experience heightened levels of mobility-based disadvantage, which deepens well-known disparities with majority-white neighborhoods based on residents’ socioeconomic statuses. Generally, mobility disadvantage compounds inequalities based on residential disadvantage, but for some Black and Hispanic neighborhoods with relatively low residential disadvantage, mobility disadvantage is a distinct form of inequality. The extent of these inequalities varies by urban form, with white spatial clustering and residential segregation by income as salient moderators. Isolation in structural neighborhood networks emerges as a clear feature of racial-ethnic inequality, though that one varies between cities.

Urban Studies
University of South Carolina (US)
Reduced inequalities, Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon