Development and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation of a Digital-Intelligence Literacy Self-Report Scale Among Students in Medical and Health-Related Programs

Medical students increasingly engage with interconnected digital systems, health data, and artificial intelligence (AI), but existing instruments vary in the aspects of digital, data, and AI literacy they assess in medical contexts. This study developed and initially evaluated the Chinese-language Digital-Intelligence Literacy Scale for Medical Students (DIL-MS). Following two rounds of consultation with 16 experts, a 34-item questionnaire was field-tested at one Chinese university. Of 1118 returned questionnaires, 710 were analyzed in non-overlapping exploratory (n = 344) and confirmatory (n = 366) subsamples. Full-pool exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis for ordinal data informed a revised 32-item scale across six domains: readiness, theoretical literacy, application skills, health data practices and interpretation, critical thinking, and ethical literacy. Parallel analysis suggested six factors, with some item assignments differing from the proposed domains. The correlated six-factor model fit better than the tested five-, four-, and single-factor alternatives, but absolute fit was limited (robust comparative fit index = 0.802; robust root mean square error of approximation = 0.090). Overall Cronbach’s α was 0.938, and domain α ranged from 0.726 to 0.871; convergent and discriminant validity evidence varied across domains. The DIL-MS provides medically contextualized self-report content for exploring perceived learning needs and mapping curricula.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Sciences
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16112019
Primary Topic
Digital literacy in education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation of a Digital-Intelligence Literacy Self-Report Scale Among Students in Medical and Health-Related Programs

陈宝莹, Xin Pan, Min Liu, Yanna Mao
3 links
Behavioral Sciences
Digital literacy in education
article

Development and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation of a Digital-Intelligence Literacy Self-Report Scale Among Students in Medical and Health-Related Programs

陈宝莹, Xin Pan, Min Liu, Yanna Mao
article en

Abstract

Medical students increasingly engage with interconnected digital systems, health data, and artificial intelligence (AI), but existing instruments vary in the aspects of digital, data, and AI literacy they assess in medical contexts. This study developed and initially evaluated the Chinese-language Digital-Intelligence Literacy Scale for Medical Students (DIL-MS). Following two rounds of consultation with 16 experts, a 34-item questionnaire was field-tested at one Chinese university. Of 1118 returned questionnaires, 710 were analyzed in non-overlapping exploratory (n = 344) and confirmatory (n = 366) subsamples. Full-pool exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis for ordinal data informed a revised 32-item scale across six domains: readiness, theoretical literacy, application skills, health data practices and interpretation, critical thinking, and ethical literacy. Parallel analysis suggested six factors, with some item assignments differing from the proposed domains. The correlated six-factor model fit better than the tested five-, four-, and single-factor alternatives, but absolute fit was limited (robust comparative fit index = 0.802; robust root mean square error of approximation = 0.090). Overall Cronbach’s α was 0.938, and domain α ranged from 0.726 to 0.871; convergent and discriminant validity evidence varied across domains. The DIL-MS provides medically contextualized self-report content for exploring perceived learning needs and mapping curricula.

Behavioral SciencesVol. 16(11)
Southern Medical University (CN)
Good health and well-being, Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Digital literacy in education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon