Exploring LLM-based approaches for wrist-center positioning of an anthropomorphic manipulator: a preliminary comparative study

This paper explores the feasibility of using Large Language Models (LLMs) to solve the wrist-center inverse positioning problem for a 3-degree-of-freedom (DOF) anthropomorphic manipulator sub-problem. The study investigates whether LLMs can perform meaningful spatial and trigonometric reasoning on kinematic equations. Three LLM-based approaches are proposed and evaluated on 50 target positions across the manipulator workspace: (1) zero-shot prompting (LLM-ZS), (2) few-shot in-context learning (LLM-FS) and (3) LLM-Guided Iterative Refinement (LGIR). All methods are benchmarked against four reimplemented traditional solvers—analytical closed-form, Damped Least Squares (DLS), Levenberg–Marquardt and Nelder–Mead—executed on the same hardware under identical conditions. The LGIR method achieves a median position error of 7.44e-05 cm across 50 targets, while traditional numerical solvers achieve near-zero errors (1.12e-15 cm for the analytical method). LLM-based methods incur computation times of several seconds per solution owing to API latency, rendering them unsuitable for real-time control. The results demonstrate that LLMs possess measurable trigonometric reasoning capability but cannot match the precision or speed of established solvers. This study provides the first multi-target comparison of multiple LLM prompting strategies against reimplemented traditional solvers for a robot positioning sub-problem, with all methods evaluated under identical experimental conditions. The findings contribute an empirical baseline for understanding the current limitations and potential of LLMs in kinematic computation tasks.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31224/8655
Primary Topic
Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Exploring LLM-based approaches for wrist-center positioning of an anthropomorphic manipulator: a preliminary comparative study

Mostafa Bayati
2 links
Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
preprint

Exploring LLM-based approaches for wrist-center positioning of an anthropomorphic manipulator: a preliminary comparative study

Mostafa Bayati
preprint en

Abstract

This paper explores the feasibility of using Large Language Models (LLMs) to solve the wrist-center inverse positioning problem for a 3-degree-of-freedom (DOF) anthropomorphic manipulator sub-problem. The study investigates whether LLMs can perform meaningful spatial and trigonometric reasoning on kinematic equations. Three LLM-based approaches are proposed and evaluated on 50 target positions across the manipulator workspace: (1) zero-shot prompting (LLM-ZS), (2) few-shot in-context learning (LLM-FS) and (3) LLM-Guided Iterative Refinement (LGIR). All methods are benchmarked against four reimplemented traditional solvers—analytical closed-form, Damped Least Squares (DLS), Levenberg–Marquardt and Nelder–Mead—executed on the same hardware under identical conditions. The LGIR method achieves a median position error of 7.44e-05 cm across 50 targets, while traditional numerical solvers achieve near-zero errors (1.12e-15 cm for the analytical method). LLM-based methods incur computation times of several seconds per solution owing to API latency, rendering them unsuitable for real-time control. The results demonstrate that LLMs possess measurable trigonometric reasoning capability but cannot match the precision or speed of established solvers. This study provides the first multi-target comparison of multiple LLM prompting strategies against reimplemented traditional solvers for a robot positioning sub-problem, with all methods evaluated under identical experimental conditions. The findings contribute an empirical baseline for understanding the current limitations and potential of LLMs in kinematic computation tasks.

Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon