The Leadership Challenge of Remote and Hybrid Work: Leveraging Organizational Identity

Remote and hybrid work challenges leadership in knowledge-intensive organizations to find new ways to maintain workers’ organizational identification when traditional structures that support leader sensegiving—such as the office—have lost much of their resonance. We suggest that leaders vary in their understandings of and desire to tightly control the organization’s boundaries as characterized under so-called “open-system” perspectives of organization, and we use this variance to articulate different leadership approaches to leveraging organizational identity to maintain employee-organization connections. We theorize a new, open-system approach that leaders may use to shift their view of remote and hybrid work from risk to benefit and propose how this leadership may build organizational identification in ways that ultimately enhance creativity and innovation. However, these advantages come with tradeoffs: leaders will be less able to blueprint in advance the value workers will create and may be less able to detect counterproductive behaviors. Our framework suggests many new directions for research aimed at understanding leadership of remote and hybrid work in knowledge-intensive organizations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Group & Organization Management
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011261495365
Primary Topic
Work-Family Balance Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Leadership Challenge of Remote and Hybrid Work: Leveraging Organizational Identity

Daan van Knippenberg, Giles Hirst, Robert C. Litchfield
2 links
Group & Organization Management
Work-Family Balance Challenges
article

The Leadership Challenge of Remote and Hybrid Work: Leveraging Organizational Identity

Daan van Knippenberg, Giles Hirst, Robert C. Litchfield
article en

Abstract

Remote and hybrid work challenges leadership in knowledge-intensive organizations to find new ways to maintain workers’ organizational identification when traditional structures that support leader sensegiving—such as the office—have lost much of their resonance. We suggest that leaders vary in their understandings of and desire to tightly control the organization’s boundaries as characterized under so-called “open-system” perspectives of organization, and we use this variance to articulate different leadership approaches to leveraging organizational identity to maintain employee-organization connections. We theorize a new, open-system approach that leaders may use to shift their view of remote and hybrid work from risk to benefit and propose how this leadership may build organizational identification in ways that ultimately enhance creativity and innovation. However, these advantages come with tradeoffs: leaders will be less able to blueprint in advance the value workers will create and may be less able to detect counterproductive behaviors. Our framework suggests many new directions for research aimed at understanding leadership of remote and hybrid work in knowledge-intensive organizations.

Group & Organization Management
Australian National University (AU), Washington and Jefferson College (US), Rice University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Work-Family Balance Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
The Leadership Challenge of Remote and Hybrid Work: Leveraging Organizational Identity — Daan van Knippenberg, Giles Hirst, et al. · Group & Organization Management (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS