Do National Animal Symbols Convey Humanlike Values?

Abstract We propose that people attribute humanlike values to animal symbols in a way that reflects the structure of human values and the value priorities that these animals were chosen to convey. In a study of Australian adults, the attribution of humanlike values to kangaroos and emus symbolizing the Australian Commonwealth as a nation moving forward reflected (a) the structure of human values and (b) the prioritization of values that express openness-to-change over maintaining the status quo. The attribution of values to kangaroos and emus was not based on self-projection, suggesting that cultural representations of animals as symbols influence the values that people attribute to them. Further, our study shows that the original representation of the humanlike values of these animal symbols was reflected in both explicit and implicit measures of values, suggesting that such measures can help us understand how people assign meaning to animal symbols.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Society and Animals
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15685306-bja10335
Primary Topic
Cultural Differences and Values
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do National Animal Symbols Convey Humanlike Values?

Joanne Sneddon, Jason Weismueller, Julie Anne Lee, Sheng Ye
Society and Animals
Cultural Differences and Values
article

Do National Animal Symbols Convey Humanlike Values?

Joanne Sneddon, Jason Weismueller, Julie Anne Lee, Sheng Ye
article en

Abstract

Abstract We propose that people attribute humanlike values to animal symbols in a way that reflects the structure of human values and the value priorities that these animals were chosen to convey. In a study of Australian adults, the attribution of humanlike values to kangaroos and emus symbolizing the Australian Commonwealth as a nation moving forward reflected (a) the structure of human values and (b) the prioritization of values that express openness-to-change over maintaining the status quo. The attribution of values to kangaroos and emus was not based on self-projection, suggesting that cultural representations of animals as symbols influence the values that people attribute to them. Further, our study shows that the original representation of the humanlike values of these animal symbols was reflected in both explicit and implicit measures of values, suggesting that such measures can help us understand how people assign meaning to animal symbols.

Society and Animals
East China University of Science and Technology (CN), The University of Western Australia (AU)
Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cultural Differences and Values
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon