Hypothesis of Bounded Evolution: Building Systems Organized by Restrictions

This document presents the Hypothesis of Bounded Evolution, formulated during the development of the Cognitive Coherence Model (CCM). It proposes that the central question for building cognitive systems is not how many possibilities a system can represent, but how its internal organization allows experience to produce persistent, consequential changes. It argues that evolution requires constraints: unlimited freedom does not guarantee coherent development, and excessive restriction prevents adaptation. It also introduces Apathetic Entropy, a proposed conceptual label for the possible loss of capabilities when a system no longer has meaningful needs or demands, and discusses bounded adaptation. The CCM is presented as one architectural path that follows from these ideas, and the paper lists points of convergence with existing work. This is a hypothesis, not a claim of truth. It reports no empirical results, makes no claim about consciousness, and does not prove that systems built differently cannot show similar results. Its limits and its validity are open questions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23729061
Primary Topic
Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Hypothesis of Bounded Evolution: Building Systems Organized by Restrictions

Pool Andres Aguilar Apolinario
4 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
preprint

Hypothesis of Bounded Evolution: Building Systems Organized by Restrictions

Pool Andres Aguilar Apolinario
preprint en

Abstract

This document presents the Hypothesis of Bounded Evolution, formulated during the development of the Cognitive Coherence Model (CCM). It proposes that the central question for building cognitive systems is not how many possibilities a system can represent, but how its internal organization allows experience to produce persistent, consequential changes. It argues that evolution requires constraints: unlimited freedom does not guarantee coherent development, and excessive restriction prevents adaptation. It also introduces Apathetic Entropy, a proposed conceptual label for the possible loss of capabilities when a system no longer has meaningful needs or demands, and discusses bounded adaptation. The CCM is presented as one architectural path that follows from these ideas, and the paper lists points of convergence with existing work. This is a hypothesis, not a claim of truth. It reports no empirical results, makes no claim about consciousness, and does not prove that systems built differently cannot show similar results. Its limits and its validity are open questions.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon