Outcome of Posterior Decompression and Stabilization by Pedicle Screws and Rods without Interbody Fusion in Multilevel Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis

Background: Lumbar spinal canal stenosis is a common degenerative condition that causes neurogenic claudication and functional disability. Traditional decompression with interbody fusion restores stability but increases rigidity and the risk of adjacent segment degeneration. Stabilization without interbody fusion has been proposed to reduce surgical morbidity. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of posterior decompression and pedicle screw–rod stabilization without interbody fusion in patients with multilevel lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Methods : This prospective interventional study was conducted at Dhaka Medical College Hospital from September 2023 to August 2024. Twenty patients aged 35–75 years with MRI-confirmed multilevel lumbar stenosis refractory to conservative therapy underwent posterior decompression and stabilization via the use of pedicle screws and rods without interbody fusion. Patients were followed up at 6 months post-operatively. Pain, disability and motor function were assessed via the visual analog scale (VAS), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale, respectively. The functional outcome was evaluated via the modified MacNab criteria. Statistical analysis was performed via paired t tests and the exact McNemar test, with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: The mean age of the patients was 55 ± 7.23 years, with a female predominance (60%). Significant improvements were observed in the mean VAS score for leg pain (6.72 ± 0.55 to 1.35 ± 0.49, p < 0.001) and back pain (6.80 ± 0.50 to 2.30 ± 0.57, p < 0.001). The ODI improved from 57.70 ± 2.18 to 16.60 ± 3.36 (p < 0.001). Motor deficits decreased from 45% preoperatively to 10% postoperatively (p = 0.016). Postoperative complications were minimal, where superficial wound infection was 15% and discitis was 5%. According to the Macnab criteria, 75% of patients had excellent and 25% good outcomes. Conclusions: Posterior decompression with pedicle screw–rod stabilization without interbody fusion offers substantial pain relief, functional recovery, and stable fixation with minimal complications in multilevel lumbar canal stenosis. It represents a safe alternative to traditional fusion surgery. J Dhaka National Med. Coll. Hos. 2026; 32 (02): 33-40

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Dhaka National Medical College & Hospital
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3329/jdnmch.v32i2.94223
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Outcome of Posterior Decompression and Stabilization by Pedicle Screws and Rods without Interbody Fusion in Multilevel Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis

Md Shahidul Islam Akon, Md Kamruzzaman, Mohammad Shamsul Alam, Md Murad Hossain et al.
1 links
Journal of Dhaka National Medical College & Hospital
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Outcome of Posterior Decompression and Stabilization by Pedicle Screws and Rods without Interbody Fusion in Multilevel Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis

Md Shahidul Islam Akon, Md Kamruzzaman, Mohammad Shamsul Alam, Md Murad Hossain, Md Mahmudul Hassan, SK Abdul Hakim
article en

Abstract

Background: Lumbar spinal canal stenosis is a common degenerative condition that causes neurogenic claudication and functional disability. Traditional decompression with interbody fusion restores stability but increases rigidity and the risk of adjacent segment degeneration. Stabilization without interbody fusion has been proposed to reduce surgical morbidity. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of posterior decompression and pedicle screw–rod stabilization without interbody fusion in patients with multilevel lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Methods : This prospective interventional study was conducted at Dhaka Medical College Hospital from September 2023 to August 2024. Twenty patients aged 35–75 years with MRI-confirmed multilevel lumbar stenosis refractory to conservative therapy underwent posterior decompression and stabilization via the use of pedicle screws and rods without interbody fusion. Patients were followed up at 6 months post-operatively. Pain, disability and motor function were assessed via the visual analog scale (VAS), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale, respectively. The functional outcome was evaluated via the modified MacNab criteria. Statistical analysis was performed via paired t tests and the exact McNemar test, with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: The mean age of the patients was 55 ± 7.23 years, with a female predominance (60%). Significant improvements were observed in the mean VAS score for leg pain (6.72 ± 0.55 to 1.35 ± 0.49, p < 0.001) and back pain (6.80 ± 0.50 to 2.30 ± 0.57, p < 0.001). The ODI improved from 57.70 ± 2.18 to 16.60 ± 3.36 (p < 0.001). Motor deficits decreased from 45% preoperatively to 10% postoperatively (p = 0.016). Postoperative complications were minimal, where superficial wound infection was 15% and discitis was 5%. According to the Macnab criteria, 75% of patients had excellent and 25% good outcomes. Conclusions: Posterior decompression with pedicle screw–rod stabilization without interbody fusion offers substantial pain relief, functional recovery, and stable fixation with minimal complications in multilevel lumbar canal stenosis. It represents a safe alternative to traditional fusion surgery. J Dhaka National Med. Coll. Hos. 2026; 32 (02): 33-40

Journal of Dhaka National Medical College & HospitalVol. 32(2)
Dayanand Medical College & Hospital (IN), Dhaka Medical College and Hospital (BD)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon