Allogeneic CAR-T, CAR-NK, and in vivo CAR-T for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: comparative evidence, platform trade-offs, and translational challenges

Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) remain treatment-dependent in many patients with severe, refractory, or organ-threatening disease. Deep B-cell depletion using chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-based therapies may induce clinical improvement and measurable immune reconstitution, but conventional autologous CAR-T manufacturing limits speed, standardization, and access. This structured narrative review compares allogeneic CAR-T, allogeneic CAR-natural killer (CAR-NK), and in vivo CAR-T. Bibliographic databases, trial registries, conference repositories, reference lists, and traceable sponsor, media, and regulatory sources were searched through 3 September 2026. Allogeneic CAR-T has the broadest clinical evidence base, although cohorts are small and mostly early-phase. All CAR-NK products with reported IMID clinical data are allogeneic; available studies suggest transient kinetics, repeat-infusion feasibility, and encouraging short-term tolerability, but durability is uncertain. Peer-reviewed in vivo evidence now includes a five-patient non-integrating LNP/linear mRNA report and a 16-patient integrating lentiviral report. Both are early, uncontrolled studies and neither supports class-wide inference. Disease-specific outcomes, background treatment, follow-up, and assays differ markedly. Complete treatment-free remission was distinguished from glucocorticoid withdrawal, immunosuppressant reduction, and remission on permitted therapy. CAR-cell, transgene DNA, and RNA detection were not pooled, and peripheral blood B-cell depletion was not treated as proof of tissue depletion. Naive-dominant B-cell recovery and declining autoantibodies indicate immune remodeling, not restored tolerance. No indirect efficacy ranking is justified. Prospective studies need standardized disease endpoints, treatment-free remission definitions, analyte-specific pharmacokinetics, paired blood–tissue pharmacodynamics, and long-term genomic, immune, and safety surveillance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Immunology
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1931185
Primary Topic
CAR-T cell therapy research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Allogeneic CAR-T, CAR-NK, and in vivo CAR-T for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: comparative evidence, platform trade-offs, and translational challenges

Zhenguo Liang, Hui Xie, 毛梦云 Mao Mengyun, Yuhan Xing et al.
2 links
Frontiers in Immunology
CAR-T cell therapy research
article

Allogeneic CAR-T, CAR-NK, and in vivo CAR-T for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: comparative evidence, platform trade-offs, and translational challenges

Zhenguo Liang, Hui Xie, 毛梦云 Mao Mengyun, Yuhan Xing, Dongze Wu
article en

Abstract

Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) remain treatment-dependent in many patients with severe, refractory, or organ-threatening disease. Deep B-cell depletion using chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-based therapies may induce clinical improvement and measurable immune reconstitution, but conventional autologous CAR-T manufacturing limits speed, standardization, and access. This structured narrative review compares allogeneic CAR-T, allogeneic CAR-natural killer (CAR-NK), and in vivo CAR-T. Bibliographic databases, trial registries, conference repositories, reference lists, and traceable sponsor, media, and regulatory sources were searched through 3 September 2026. Allogeneic CAR-T has the broadest clinical evidence base, although cohorts are small and mostly early-phase. All CAR-NK products with reported IMID clinical data are allogeneic; available studies suggest transient kinetics, repeat-infusion feasibility, and encouraging short-term tolerability, but durability is uncertain. Peer-reviewed in vivo evidence now includes a five-patient non-integrating LNP/linear mRNA report and a 16-patient integrating lentiviral report. Both are early, uncontrolled studies and neither supports class-wide inference. Disease-specific outcomes, background treatment, follow-up, and assays differ markedly. Complete treatment-free remission was distinguished from glucocorticoid withdrawal, immunosuppressant reduction, and remission on permitted therapy. CAR-cell, transgene DNA, and RNA detection were not pooled, and peripheral blood B-cell depletion was not treated as proof of tissue depletion. Naive-dominant B-cell recovery and declining autoantibodies indicate immune remodeling, not restored tolerance. No indirect efficacy ranking is justified. Prospective studies need standardized disease endpoints, treatment-free remission definitions, analyte-specific pharmacokinetics, paired blood–tissue pharmacodynamics, and long-term genomic, immune, and safety surveillance.

Frontiers in ImmunologyVol. 17
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN), Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital (CN), Antengene Corporation Limited (China) (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
CAR-T cell therapy research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon