Fishing in the Archive

Abstract This essay considers the effects of the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) on research in the humanities—specifically in the field of the history of music theory—by linking these transformative developments to the momentous rise of relevance-ranked full-text search over the preceding quarter century. It considers both the extraordinary potential of LLM-assisted archival work and its risks, examining AI-enabled archival searches and new research paradigms on the one hand, and opaque mediation, “AI slop,” and above all the dangers of deskilling and cognitive surrender on the other. It argues that music theorists and humanists more broadly must actively engage with these tools rather than avoid them, since scholars trained in earlier research regimes are uniquely positioned to recognize what stands to be gained—and lost—as close reading gives way to new methods (and habits) of research.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Music Theory Spectrum
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/mts/mtag029
Primary Topic
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fishing in the Archive

Carmel Raz
1 links
Music Theory Spectrum
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
article

Fishing in the Archive

Carmel Raz
article en

Abstract

Abstract This essay considers the effects of the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) on research in the humanities—specifically in the field of the history of music theory—by linking these transformative developments to the momentous rise of relevance-ranked full-text search over the preceding quarter century. It considers both the extraordinary potential of LLM-assisted archival work and its risks, examining AI-enabled archival searches and new research paradigms on the one hand, and opaque mediation, “AI slop,” and above all the dangers of deskilling and cognitive surrender on the other. It argues that music theorists and humanists more broadly must actively engage with these tools rather than avoid them, since scholars trained in earlier research regimes are uniquely positioned to recognize what stands to be gained—and lost—as close reading gives way to new methods (and habits) of research.

Music Theory Spectrum
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon