Disaster Narratives and Forestry Policy: A Comparative Analysis of National and Regional Media Coverage of the 2025 Sumatra Floods

The 2025 Sumatra floods generated policy debate across Southeast Asia. Media coverage demonstrates how news organizations frame crises and legitimize particular policy responses in their role as policy actors. This study compares the elements and strategies of media policy narratives in Indonesia, Singapore, and Malaysia using the meso-level Narrative Policy Framework (NPF). It applies qualitative content analysis to 309 online news articles published between November 2025 and May 2026. The findings show that Indonesian media exhibit the strongest combination of containment (90.5%) and angel-shift (85.3%), constructing a Story of Control that positions the government as the Hero and privileges domestic solutions. Singaporean media maintain a high level of angel-shift (92.3%) in operational elements while increasing expansion (20.5%) in structural elements, shifting the narrative toward a Story of Decline and demands for accountability. Malaysian media display the highest levels of expansion (25.4%) and devil-shift (22.0%), casting corporations as Villains and constructing Stymied Progress narratives oriented toward regional reform. These three patterns correspond to each country's National Narrative Position, defined by the interaction of media ownership linkages with state actors, press freedom scores, and the media's structural position relative to the event, rather than by actors' belief coalitions as assumed in conventional NPF applications. The findings support three propositions for extending the NPF: cross-national narrative bifurcation, whereby policy legitimacy surrounding the same transnational event branches rather than converges; moderation by National Narrative Position, whereby media ownership structures and press regimes shape the direction of bifurcation; and legitimation-to-policy direction, whereby narratives not only produce legitimacy but also steer policy trajectories across countries. The study extends the NPF into disaster governance and demonstrates that media narrative framing shapes the legitimacy of forest-management policy reform in Southeast Asia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
KASTA Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Agama Budaya dan Terapan
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58218/kasta.v6i4.4451
Primary Topic
Media Studies and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disaster Narratives and Forestry Policy: A Comparative Analysis of National and Regional Media Coverage of the 2025 Sumatra Floods

Agus Pramusinto, Naufal Aji Satria
1 links
KASTA Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Agama Budaya dan Terapan
Media Studies and Communication
article

Disaster Narratives and Forestry Policy: A Comparative Analysis of National and Regional Media Coverage of the 2025 Sumatra Floods

Agus Pramusinto, Naufal Aji Satria
article en

Abstract

The 2025 Sumatra floods generated policy debate across Southeast Asia. Media coverage demonstrates how news organizations frame crises and legitimize particular policy responses in their role as policy actors. This study compares the elements and strategies of media policy narratives in Indonesia, Singapore, and Malaysia using the meso-level Narrative Policy Framework (NPF). It applies qualitative content analysis to 309 online news articles published between November 2025 and May 2026. The findings show that Indonesian media exhibit the strongest combination of containment (90.5%) and angel-shift (85.3%), constructing a Story of Control that positions the government as the Hero and privileges domestic solutions. Singaporean media maintain a high level of angel-shift (92.3%) in operational elements while increasing expansion (20.5%) in structural elements, shifting the narrative toward a Story of Decline and demands for accountability. Malaysian media display the highest levels of expansion (25.4%) and devil-shift (22.0%), casting corporations as Villains and constructing Stymied Progress narratives oriented toward regional reform. These three patterns correspond to each country's National Narrative Position, defined by the interaction of media ownership linkages with state actors, press freedom scores, and the media's structural position relative to the event, rather than by actors' belief coalitions as assumed in conventional NPF applications. The findings support three propositions for extending the NPF: cross-national narrative bifurcation, whereby policy legitimacy surrounding the same transnational event branches rather than converges; moderation by National Narrative Position, whereby media ownership structures and press regimes shape the direction of bifurcation; and legitimation-to-policy direction, whereby narratives not only produce legitimacy but also steer policy trajectories across countries. The study extends the NPF into disaster governance and demonstrates that media narrative framing shapes the legitimacy of forest-management policy reform in Southeast Asia.

KASTA Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Agama Budaya dan TerapanVol. 6(4)
Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Media Studies and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon