Neurofeedback of meditation states to close the loop between subjective experience and brain activity: Evaluating four neural markers

Neurofeedback creates a closed loop between subjective experience and brain activity. Such a feedback loop might allow establishing direct neuro-experiential correspondences, thereby narrowing the gap between the seemingly irreconcilable domains of private conscioussness and external measurement. We introduce a repeated-probing paradigm that allows systematic testing of such neuro-experiential correspondences within individuals by randomizing and blinding the feedback signal direction across trials, combined with semi-structured phenomenological interviews following unblinded regulation sessions. We apply this paradigm to electroencephalography (EEG) neurofeedback in experienced meditators across two studies. Study 1 (n=9) aimed to replicate the previously reported correspondence between posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) gamma activity and effortless awareness, extending the paradigm from visual to auditory feedback. An exploratory Study 2 (n=4) evaluated three additional markers: occipital alpha, midfrontal theta, and PCC high-beta power. In Study 1, participants identified the expected correspondence significantly above chance for both visual and auditory feedback (mean accuracy=72.5%). Additionally, gamma power was significantly reduced during neurofeedback-assisted meditation. In Study 2, no marker yielded significant neuro-experiential correspondences, although alpha power increased and high-beta power decreased during neurofeedback-assisted meditation. Phenomenological interviews revealed distinct meditative strategies, with releasing effort and control predominating in gamma neurofeedback. However, whole-brain and control analyses raised concerns about the spatial specificity and potential muscular contamination of the gamma signal. Our findings introduce a novel neurophenomenological neurofeedback paradigm, replicate and extend previous findings on the correspondence between effortless awareness and gamma feedback, and highlight important limitations in interpreting these effects as reflecting neural rather than muscular activity.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/a6j89_v2
Primary Topic
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Neurofeedback of meditation states to close the loop between subjective experience and brain activity: Evaluating four neural markers

Lukas Hecker, Marieke K. van Vugt, Fynn‐Mathis Trautwein, Daniel Andrew Atad et al.
1 links
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
preprint

Neurofeedback of meditation states to close the loop between subjective experience and brain activity: Evaluating four neural markers

Lukas Hecker, Marieke K. van Vugt, Fynn‐Mathis Trautwein, Daniel Andrew Atad, Stefan Schmidt, Luca Saini, Nursena Armagan, Henrik Röhr, Gabriel Salwey, Andreas Tzschaschel
preprint en

Abstract

Neurofeedback creates a closed loop between subjective experience and brain activity. Such a feedback loop might allow establishing direct neuro-experiential correspondences, thereby narrowing the gap between the seemingly irreconcilable domains of private conscioussness and external measurement. We introduce a repeated-probing paradigm that allows systematic testing of such neuro-experiential correspondences within individuals by randomizing and blinding the feedback signal direction across trials, combined with semi-structured phenomenological interviews following unblinded regulation sessions. We apply this paradigm to electroencephalography (EEG) neurofeedback in experienced meditators across two studies. Study 1 (n=9) aimed to replicate the previously reported correspondence between posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) gamma activity and effortless awareness, extending the paradigm from visual to auditory feedback. An exploratory Study 2 (n=4) evaluated three additional markers: occipital alpha, midfrontal theta, and PCC high-beta power. In Study 1, participants identified the expected correspondence significantly above chance for both visual and auditory feedback (mean accuracy=72.5%). Additionally, gamma power was significantly reduced during neurofeedback-assisted meditation. In Study 2, no marker yielded significant neuro-experiential correspondences, although alpha power increased and high-beta power decreased during neurofeedback-assisted meditation. Phenomenological interviews revealed distinct meditative strategies, with releasing effort and control predominating in gamma neurofeedback. However, whole-brain and control analyses raised concerns about the spatial specificity and potential muscular contamination of the gamma signal. Our findings introduce a novel neurophenomenological neurofeedback paradigm, replicate and extend previous findings on the correspondence between effortless awareness and gamma feedback, and highlight important limitations in interpreting these effects as reflecting neural rather than muscular activity.

Good health and well-being
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon