INTERDISCIPLINARY LEARNING AS A MEANS OF ENHANCING ANALYTICAL AND REFLECTIVE THINKING IN PEDAGOGY MASTER'S STUDENTS

The article explores the educational potential of interdisciplinary learning in strengthening analytical and reflective thinking among master’s students specializing in pedagogy. It focuses on how the purposeful integration of pedagogical, psychological, philosophical, and research-methodological perspectives can help students interpret complex educational situations, compare explanations, evaluate evidence, and justify professional decisions. The paper outlines key dimensions of analytical and reflective thinking and presents a staged instructional framework involving problem identification, interdisciplinary inquiry, evidence-based discussion, and reflective review. It also considers learning activities such as case analysis, academic debate, concept mapping, and reflective writing. The proposed framework is theoretical and methodological; its practical value lies in providing a structured basis for designing learning tasks that move beyond reproduction of information toward reasoned interpretation and professional judgment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23717142
Primary Topic
Reflective Practices in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

INTERDISCIPLINARY LEARNING AS A MEANS OF ENHANCING ANALYTICAL AND REFLECTIVE THINKING IN PEDAGOGY MASTER'S STUDENTS

Go'zal Jumaniyazova
2 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Reflective Practices in Education
article

INTERDISCIPLINARY LEARNING AS A MEANS OF ENHANCING ANALYTICAL AND REFLECTIVE THINKING IN PEDAGOGY MASTER'S STUDENTS

Go'zal Jumaniyazova
article en

Abstract

The article explores the educational potential of interdisciplinary learning in strengthening analytical and reflective thinking among master’s students specializing in pedagogy. It focuses on how the purposeful integration of pedagogical, psychological, philosophical, and research-methodological perspectives can help students interpret complex educational situations, compare explanations, evaluate evidence, and justify professional decisions. The paper outlines key dimensions of analytical and reflective thinking and presents a staged instructional framework involving problem identification, interdisciplinary inquiry, evidence-based discussion, and reflective review. It also considers learning activities such as case analysis, academic debate, concept mapping, and reflective writing. The proposed framework is theoretical and methodological; its practical value lies in providing a structured basis for designing learning tasks that move beyond reproduction of information toward reasoned interpretation and professional judgment.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Reflective Practices in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon