Association of Medicare’s ESRD Treatment Choices Model with Timely Access to Kidney Transplantation in the Southeastern United States

BACKGROUND: In 2021, Medicare's End-Stage Renal Disease Treatment Choices (ETC) Model randomly assigned 30% of U.S. dialysis facilities to financial incentives to increase home dialysis, waitlisting, and living-donor kidney transplantation. Early evaluations found no improvements in waitlisting or transplantation, but whether the ETC influenced upstream transplant access steps controlled by dialysis facilities remains unknown. METHODS: Using linked data from the United States Renal Data System, Early Steps to Transplant Access Registry, and Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we assessed the association of ETC implementation with transplant referral within 1 year of dialysis initiation, evaluation initiation within 6 months of referral, waitlisting or living-donor transplantation within 2 years of dialysis initiation, and corresponding time-to-event outcomes. Difference-in-differences analyses compared outcomes at ETC versus control facilities among adult Traditional Medicare beneficiaries initiating dialysis in Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina before (2015-2019) and after (2021-2023) ETC implementation. Follow-up extended through December 2024 (referral, evaluation) and June 2025 (waitlisting, transplantation). RESULTS: Among 26,809 individuals in 706 facilities (mean [SD] age, 57 [13]; 43% female; 53% non-Hispanic Black; 46% dual Medicare/Medicaid eligible), ETC implementation was associated with adjusted differential increases in timely referral, evaluation start, and waitlisting or living-donor transplantation of 3.58 (95% CI, -1.30 to 8.45), 8.52 (95% CI, -1.42 to 18.45), and 3.61 (95% CI, -0.26 to 7.48) percentage points, respectively, relative to control facilities. Time-to-event analyses were consistent with primary results and substantial COVID-era delays in transplant referral across both ETC and control regions. CONCLUSIONS: ETC implementation was not associated with definitive evidence of statistically significant improvements in timely transplant referral, evaluation initiation, waitlisting, or living-donor transplantation in the Southeastern U.S. The absence of detectable changes in transplant access processes directly influenced by dialysis facilities suggests that incentive misalignment alone is unlikely to explain the ETC Model's limited impact on transplantation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.0000001300
Primary Topic
Organ Donation and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association of Medicare’s ESRD Treatment Choices Model with Timely Access to Kidney Transplantation in the Southeastern United States

Kelsey M. Drewry, Rachel E. Patzer, Rajnish Mehrotra, Amal N. Trivedi et al.
2 links
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Organ Donation and Transplantation
article

Association of Medicare’s ESRD Treatment Choices Model with Timely Access to Kidney Transplantation in the Southeastern United States

Kelsey M. Drewry, Rachel E. Patzer, Rajnish Mehrotra, Amal N. Trivedi, Kalli G. Koukounas, Kristopher M. Huffman, Adam S. Wilk, Daeho Kim, Christopher H. Schmid, Ankur D. Shah
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2021, Medicare's End-Stage Renal Disease Treatment Choices (ETC) Model randomly assigned 30% of U.S. dialysis facilities to financial incentives to increase home dialysis, waitlisting, and living-donor kidney transplantation. Early evaluations found no improvements in waitlisting or transplantation, but whether the ETC influenced upstream transplant access steps controlled by dialysis facilities remains unknown. METHODS: Using linked data from the United States Renal Data System, Early Steps to Transplant Access Registry, and Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we assessed the association of ETC implementation with transplant referral within 1 year of dialysis initiation, evaluation initiation within 6 months of referral, waitlisting or living-donor transplantation within 2 years of dialysis initiation, and corresponding time-to-event outcomes. Difference-in-differences analyses compared outcomes at ETC versus control facilities among adult Traditional Medicare beneficiaries initiating dialysis in Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina before (2015-2019) and after (2021-2023) ETC implementation. Follow-up extended through December 2024 (referral, evaluation) and June 2025 (waitlisting, transplantation). RESULTS: Among 26,809 individuals in 706 facilities (mean [SD] age, 57 [13]; 43% female; 53% non-Hispanic Black; 46% dual Medicare/Medicaid eligible), ETC implementation was associated with adjusted differential increases in timely referral, evaluation start, and waitlisting or living-donor transplantation of 3.58 (95% CI, -1.30 to 8.45), 8.52 (95% CI, -1.42 to 18.45), and 3.61 (95% CI, -0.26 to 7.48) percentage points, respectively, relative to control facilities. Time-to-event analyses were consistent with primary results and substantial COVID-era delays in transplant referral across both ETC and control regions. CONCLUSIONS: ETC implementation was not associated with definitive evidence of statistically significant improvements in timely transplant referral, evaluation initiation, waitlisting, or living-donor transplantation in the Southeastern U.S. The absence of detectable changes in transplant access processes directly influenced by dialysis facilities suggests that incentive misalignment alone is unlikely to explain the ETC Model's limited impact on transplantation.

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Regenstrief Institute (US), University of Washington (US), Brown University (US), Providence VA Medical Center (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Good health and well-being, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Organ Donation and Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon