Comparative Assessment of Physiological Vulnerability Among Male Underground and Surface Coal Mine Workers: A Cross-Sectional Study

Introduction: Underground miners experience exposure to coal dust, poor ventilation, physical effort, stress, and difficult underground conditions, whereas surface miners experience dust and environmental conditions on the ground. This study aimed to compare physiological characteristics, such as cardiovascular, pulmonary, and oxygenation functions among male underground and surface coal miners. Methods: This study compares two groups of men: 90 underground workers (UW) and 90 surface workers (SW). Anthropometric characteristics, blood pressure, peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), pulse rate, peak expiratory flow rate (PEF), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), FEV1/FVC ratio, and forced expiratory flow between 25%–75% of FVC (FEF25–75) were measured. Differences between the two groups were analysed using the Welch t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square/Fisher’s exact test, and correlation analysis. Results: The worker groups were similar in terms of age, body mass index, height, and weight. Underground laborers exhibited significantly higher systolic blood pressure (143.17 vs. 132.39 mmHg; p<0.001), diastolic blood pressure (88.60 vs. 81.47 mmHg; p<0.001), and heart rate at rest (91.04 vs. 77.39 bpm; p<0.001), but significantly lower SpO2 (94.12% vs. 97.40%; p<0.001), PEF (353.24 vs. 455.10 L/min; p<0.001), FVC (2.73 vs. 3.37 L; p<0.001), FEV1 (1.95 vs. 2.74 L; p<0.001), FEV1/FVC (0.713 vs. 0.812; p<0.001), and FEF25–75 (1.93 vs. 2.89 L/s; p<0.001). The prevalence of hypertension, SpO2 < 95%, tachycardia, FEV1/FVC < 0.7, and PEF < 300 was significantly higher in underground miners. Adjusting for age and body mass index, underground work was significantly associated with almost all cardiovascular, oxygenation, and spirometric variables. Conclusion: Underground male coal miners showed significantly higher physiological vulnerability than their counterparts working on the surface evidenced by decreased pulmonary function, low oxygen saturation, increased resting heart rate, and elevated blood pressure.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23723333
Primary Topic
Industrial and Mining Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Assessment of Physiological Vulnerability Among Male Underground and Surface Coal Mine Workers: A Cross-Sectional Study

Arijit Chatterjee, Sukinkar Mukherjee
1 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Industrial and Mining Safety
article

Comparative Assessment of Physiological Vulnerability Among Male Underground and Surface Coal Mine Workers: A Cross-Sectional Study

Arijit Chatterjee, Sukinkar Mukherjee
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Underground miners experience exposure to coal dust, poor ventilation, physical effort, stress, and difficult underground conditions, whereas surface miners experience dust and environmental conditions on the ground. This study aimed to compare physiological characteristics, such as cardiovascular, pulmonary, and oxygenation functions among male underground and surface coal miners. Methods: This study compares two groups of men: 90 underground workers (UW) and 90 surface workers (SW). Anthropometric characteristics, blood pressure, peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), pulse rate, peak expiratory flow rate (PEF), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), FEV1/FVC ratio, and forced expiratory flow between 25%–75% of FVC (FEF25–75) were measured. Differences between the two groups were analysed using the Welch t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square/Fisher’s exact test, and correlation analysis. Results: The worker groups were similar in terms of age, body mass index, height, and weight. Underground laborers exhibited significantly higher systolic blood pressure (143.17 vs. 132.39 mmHg; p<0.001), diastolic blood pressure (88.60 vs. 81.47 mmHg; p<0.001), and heart rate at rest (91.04 vs. 77.39 bpm; p<0.001), but significantly lower SpO2 (94.12% vs. 97.40%; p<0.001), PEF (353.24 vs. 455.10 L/min; p<0.001), FVC (2.73 vs. 3.37 L; p<0.001), FEV1 (1.95 vs. 2.74 L; p<0.001), FEV1/FVC (0.713 vs. 0.812; p<0.001), and FEF25–75 (1.93 vs. 2.89 L/s; p<0.001). The prevalence of hypertension, SpO2 < 95%, tachycardia, FEV1/FVC < 0.7, and PEF < 300 was significantly higher in underground miners. Adjusting for age and body mass index, underground work was significantly associated with almost all cardiovascular, oxygenation, and spirometric variables. Conclusion: Underground male coal miners showed significantly higher physiological vulnerability than their counterparts working on the surface evidenced by decreased pulmonary function, low oxygen saturation, increased resting heart rate, and elevated blood pressure.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Industrial and Mining Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Comparative Assessment of Physiological Vulnerability Among Male Underground and Surface Coal Mine Workers: A Cross-Sectional Study — Arijit Chatterjee, Sukinkar Mukherjee · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS