Evolução paradigmática dos fatores humanos na aviação

This study analyzed the paradigmatic evolution of human factors in aviation and operational safety, aiming to understand conceptual transformations related to human performance in complex sociotechnical systems. This is a qualitative, historical-epistemological, and analytical-reflective integrative review grounded in Whittemore and Knafl, Torraco, Braun and Clarke, and Levac, Colquhoun and O’Brien. Searches were conducted in Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and SciELO, as well as institutional aviation safety documents. The final corpus comprised 81 studies. Findings revealed a progressive shift from models centered on individual human error toward cognitive, organizational, systemic, and adaptive approaches. Nevertheless, limitations remain regarding fragmentation between cognition, physiology, emotion, and human-automation interaction. It is concluded that contemporary human factors require integrative models capable of understanding human performance as a dynamic and multimodal phenomenon in complex operational environments.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
REVISTA DA UNIFA
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22480/rev.unifa.2026.39.1080
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evolução paradigmática dos fatores humanos na aviação

Marcos Lázaro Pereira de Alcântara
3 links
REVISTA DA UNIFA
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Evolução paradigmática dos fatores humanos na aviação

Marcos Lázaro Pereira de Alcântara
article en

Abstract

This study analyzed the paradigmatic evolution of human factors in aviation and operational safety, aiming to understand conceptual transformations related to human performance in complex sociotechnical systems. This is a qualitative, historical-epistemological, and analytical-reflective integrative review grounded in Whittemore and Knafl, Torraco, Braun and Clarke, and Levac, Colquhoun and O’Brien. Searches were conducted in Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and SciELO, as well as institutional aviation safety documents. The final corpus comprised 81 studies. Findings revealed a progressive shift from models centered on individual human error toward cognitive, organizational, systemic, and adaptive approaches. Nevertheless, limitations remain regarding fragmentation between cognition, physiology, emotion, and human-automation interaction. It is concluded that contemporary human factors require integrative models capable of understanding human performance as a dynamic and multimodal phenomenon in complex operational environments.

REVISTA DA UNIFAVol. 39
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon