Time in the Advent of God: Nonclosure, Eschatological Future, and the Ground of Human Responsibility

This paper argues that the ground of human moral responsibility cannot be located in the intrinsic continuity or self-completing capacity of temporal existence, but only in the “advent” structure of God’s relationship to time. Drawing on the distinction between futurus (the future as extension of the present) and adventus (the future as arrival from beyond), the paper contends that human temporal experience is constitutively “non-closed” – it does not form self-completing narratives or generate immanent meaning. The futurus model, which understands the future as the perfection of the present, cannot ground responsibility because it makes the meaning of action dependent on a historical process that is itself non-closing. Only the adventus structure – in which the future arrives as the gift of the Other – can render present action morally weighty by constituting the present as kairos, a decisive moment of response. The paper develops this argument through an engagement with Moltmann’s eschatology, the philosophy of time in Heschel and Boulad, and the biblical concept of kairos. It concludes that responsibility is not self-completion but response to summons, and that eternal life is not the achievement of human effort but the gift of the arriving God.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal Of Recent Trends In Multidisciplinary Research
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59256/ijrtmr.20260605059
Primary Topic
Karl Barth and Christian Theology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Time in the Advent of God: Nonclosure, Eschatological Future, and the Ground of Human Responsibility

Alaribe Gilbert N
International Journal Of Recent Trends In Multidisciplinary Research
Karl Barth and Christian Theology
article

Time in the Advent of God: Nonclosure, Eschatological Future, and the Ground of Human Responsibility

Alaribe Gilbert N
article en

Abstract

This paper argues that the ground of human moral responsibility cannot be located in the intrinsic continuity or self-completing capacity of temporal existence, but only in the “advent” structure of God’s relationship to time. Drawing on the distinction between futurus (the future as extension of the present) and adventus (the future as arrival from beyond), the paper contends that human temporal experience is constitutively “non-closed” – it does not form self-completing narratives or generate immanent meaning. The futurus model, which understands the future as the perfection of the present, cannot ground responsibility because it makes the meaning of action dependent on a historical process that is itself non-closing. Only the adventus structure – in which the future arrives as the gift of the Other – can render present action morally weighty by constituting the present as kairos, a decisive moment of response. The paper develops this argument through an engagement with Moltmann’s eschatology, the philosophy of time in Heschel and Boulad, and the biblical concept of kairos. It concludes that responsibility is not self-completion but response to summons, and that eternal life is not the achievement of human effort but the gift of the arriving God.

International Journal Of Recent Trends In Multidisciplinary Research
Alvan Ikoku Federal University of Education, Owerri (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Karl Barth and Christian Theology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon