Infrastructure-Aware Materials Discovery: Resource Allocation, Cost, and Carbon in AI-Driven Workflows

Abstract Machine-learned interatomic potentials have converted materials-discovery campaigns from tens to hundreds of expensive density-functional calculations into populations of 10^4 to 10^6 short, independent evaluations, relocating the dominant constraint from the electronic-structure solver to the orchestration layer beneath it. We organize AI-driven materials-discovery workloads into four recurring classes—short independent screening tasks, long-running simulations, tightly coupled ab initio calculations, and iterative active-learning loops—and map spot and preemptible computing, checkpointing and workflow-level fault tolerance, autoscaling, cloud bursting, cost-aware Bayesian optimization, and carbon-aware scheduling against this taxonomy. High-throughput screening of metal–organic frameworks serves as a case study arguing that the optimal balance of elastic, stable, and interruptible resources follows from task duration, computational coupling, and recovery cost rather than from generic cloud-optimization heuristics. We further argue that the realized cost of a materials calculation decomposes into scientific, provisioning, recovery, and data-movement terms, of which only the first is a property of the calculation itself. Because the remaining terms vary with market and grid conditions on timescales of minutes, an acquisition function that prices candidates by fidelity alone systematically misprices the campaign it is scheduling. Integrating infrastructure cost and carbon signals into scientific decision-making is identified as a key open problem for autonomous discovery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Physics Materials
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7639/aebabe
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Infrastructure-Aware Materials Discovery: Resource Allocation, Cost, and Carbon in AI-Driven Workflows

Tridip Das, William A. Goddard, Naveen Goel
1 links
Journal of Physics Materials
Machine Learning in Materials Science
article

Infrastructure-Aware Materials Discovery: Resource Allocation, Cost, and Carbon in AI-Driven Workflows

Tridip Das, William A. Goddard, Naveen Goel
article en

Abstract

Abstract Machine-learned interatomic potentials have converted materials-discovery campaigns from tens to hundreds of expensive density-functional calculations into populations of 10^4 to 10^6 short, independent evaluations, relocating the dominant constraint from the electronic-structure solver to the orchestration layer beneath it. We organize AI-driven materials-discovery workloads into four recurring classes—short independent screening tasks, long-running simulations, tightly coupled ab initio calculations, and iterative active-learning loops—and map spot and preemptible computing, checkpointing and workflow-level fault tolerance, autoscaling, cloud bursting, cost-aware Bayesian optimization, and carbon-aware scheduling against this taxonomy. High-throughput screening of metal–organic frameworks serves as a case study arguing that the optimal balance of elastic, stable, and interruptible resources follows from task duration, computational coupling, and recovery cost rather than from generic cloud-optimization heuristics. We further argue that the realized cost of a materials calculation decomposes into scientific, provisioning, recovery, and data-movement terms, of which only the first is a property of the calculation itself. Because the remaining terms vary with market and grid conditions on timescales of minutes, an acquisition function that prices candidates by fidelity alone systematically misprices the campaign it is scheduling. Integrating infrastructure cost and carbon signals into scientific decision-making is identified as a key open problem for autonomous discovery.

Journal of Physics Materials
Florida State University (US), California Institute of Technology (US), Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Infrastructure-Aware Materials Discovery: Resource Allocation, Cost, and Carbon in AI-Driven Workflows — Tridip Das, William A. Goddard, et al. · Journal of Physics Materials (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS