Iterative Refinement for Structural Optimization of De Novo Protein Sequences

In this paper, we introduce an iterative refinement procedure that substitutes individual amino acid residues in a predicted protein sequence to minimize structural error; substitutions are guided by a weighted composite score of global evaluation metrics including the TM-score, GDT-TS, and RMSD. Starting from an initial sequence prediction produced by a structure-aware graph neural network (GNN) [5], the refinement procedure evaluates candidate amino acid substitutions at each position by folding the modified sequence with ESMFold [9] and accepting substitutions that satisfy both a global structural improvement criterion and a local displacement threshold. Evaluated on a matched sample of 224 proteins, this set of methods reduced mean RMSD from 8.097 Å to 4.570 Å relative to the model's initial prediction, a 43.6% reduction, with corresponding reductions of 46.2% relative to ProteinMPNN and 27.2% relative to native ESMFolded sequences; these differences were statistically significant by paired t-test (p < 0.001). Our results show that post-prediction iterative refinement can significantly improve the structural accuracy of de novo protein sequences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.27.762198
Primary Topic
Protein Structure and Dynamics
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Iterative Refinement for Structural Optimization of De Novo Protein Sequences

Lakshman S. Tamil, Chance M Gammill
1 links
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Protein Structure and Dynamics
preprint

Iterative Refinement for Structural Optimization of De Novo Protein Sequences

Lakshman S. Tamil, Chance M Gammill
preprint en

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce an iterative refinement procedure that substitutes individual amino acid residues in a predicted protein sequence to minimize structural error; substitutions are guided by a weighted composite score of global evaluation metrics including the TM-score, GDT-TS, and RMSD. Starting from an initial sequence prediction produced by a structure-aware graph neural network (GNN) [5], the refinement procedure evaluates candidate amino acid substitutions at each position by folding the modified sequence with ESMFold [9] and accepting substitutions that satisfy both a global structural improvement criterion and a local displacement threshold. Evaluated on a matched sample of 224 proteins, this set of methods reduced mean RMSD from 8.097 Å to 4.570 Å relative to the model's initial prediction, a 43.6% reduction, with corresponding reductions of 46.2% relative to ProteinMPNN and 27.2% relative to native ESMFolded sequences; these differences were statistically significant by paired t-test (p < 0.001). Our results show that post-prediction iterative refinement can significantly improve the structural accuracy of de novo protein sequences.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
Protein Structure and Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon