Pro‐environmental claims versus carbon realities: Behavioural insights of smallholder mandarin farmers in Nepal

Abstract Agriculture is one of the major sources of greenhouse gas emissions, and promoting Pro‐Environmental Behaviour (PEB) among farmers offers substantial potential for climate change mitigation. However, understanding of the psychological factors shaping farmers' perceived PEB and how these perceptions align with their actual environmental performance remains limited. This study applied Ajzen's Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) and employed covariance‐based structural equation modelling to explore relationships among attitude, subjective norms, Perceived Behavioural Control (PBC), behavioural intention and PEB, alongside a comparison between self‐reported and actual PEB. A web‐based Qualtrics survey was conducted to assess perceived PEB, and semi‐structured interviews were used to collect farm‐level data to estimate carbon footprint as a proxy for actual behaviour among 120 mandarin farmers in Syangja, Nepal, selected using a multi‐stage sampling approach. Attitude and PBC were strong predictors of behavioural intention, while subjective norms showed weaker influence. Behavioural intention significantly predicted PEB and education, training participation and household income moderated several of these relationships, highlighting socio‐economic variation in behavioural determinants. Comparison between perceived and actual PEB revealed a moderate correlation, with 71% of the variance unexplained. This indicates a substantial gap between farmers' self‐perceptions and their measurable environmental outcomes, suggesting that self‐reported indicators alone may overstate pro‐environmental performance. Reducing barriers to PBC and strengthening positive environmental attitudes are key to promoting genuine PEB. Engaging governmental, institutional and peer networks can reinforce farmers' control beliefs and collective climate action. Future research should examine the drivers of alignment between perceived and actual PEB to enhance the reliability of behavioural assessment and inform evidence‐based agricultural climate policies. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
People and Nature
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.70465
Primary Topic
Environmental Education and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pro‐environmental claims versus carbon realities: Behavioural insights of smallholder mandarin farmers in Nepal

Sandip Subedi, Rajendra Adhikari, Benjamin Dent
1 links
People and Nature
Environmental Education and Sustainability
article

Pro‐environmental claims versus carbon realities: Behavioural insights of smallholder mandarin farmers in Nepal

Sandip Subedi, Rajendra Adhikari, Benjamin Dent
article en

Abstract

Abstract Agriculture is one of the major sources of greenhouse gas emissions, and promoting Pro‐Environmental Behaviour (PEB) among farmers offers substantial potential for climate change mitigation. However, understanding of the psychological factors shaping farmers' perceived PEB and how these perceptions align with their actual environmental performance remains limited. This study applied Ajzen's Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) and employed covariance‐based structural equation modelling to explore relationships among attitude, subjective norms, Perceived Behavioural Control (PBC), behavioural intention and PEB, alongside a comparison between self‐reported and actual PEB. A web‐based Qualtrics survey was conducted to assess perceived PEB, and semi‐structured interviews were used to collect farm‐level data to estimate carbon footprint as a proxy for actual behaviour among 120 mandarin farmers in Syangja, Nepal, selected using a multi‐stage sampling approach. Attitude and PBC were strong predictors of behavioural intention, while subjective norms showed weaker influence. Behavioural intention significantly predicted PEB and education, training participation and household income moderated several of these relationships, highlighting socio‐economic variation in behavioural determinants. Comparison between perceived and actual PEB revealed a moderate correlation, with 71% of the variance unexplained. This indicates a substantial gap between farmers' self‐perceptions and their measurable environmental outcomes, suggesting that self‐reported indicators alone may overstate pro‐environmental performance. Reducing barriers to PBC and strengthening positive environmental attitudes are key to promoting genuine PEB. Engaging governmental, institutional and peer networks can reinforce farmers' control beliefs and collective climate action. Future research should examine the drivers of alignment between perceived and actual PEB to enhance the reliability of behavioural assessment and inform evidence‐based agricultural climate policies. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

People and Nature
The University of Queensland (AU), Government of Nepal (NP)
Australian Government, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Australian Government
Climate action, Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Environmental Education and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon