Separated thermal–mechanical damage modelling of concrete at elevated temperatures: formulation, ABAQUS implementation, and fire performance prediction

Predicting the response of concrete to fire remains difficult because of the complex, coupled thermal and mechanical damage that develops at elevated temperatures, which existing constitutive models often treat in a lumped or inconsistent manner. This study develops a thermodynamically consistent damage–plasticity model in which thermal and mechanical damage evolve through independent, energy-based laws, coupled with temperature-dependent plasticity and a full strain decomposition that includes thermal expansion and transient creep. The model is implemented as an ABAQUS UMAT subroutine to enable analysis from the material to the structural scale. Model predictions were validated against published experimental data over the range 20–600 °C. At the material scale, the predicted compressive strength decreases from 39 MPa at ambient temperature to 30 MPa (77%) at 400 °C and 14 MPa (36%) at 600 °C, while the thermal damage variable reaches 0.36 and 0.75, respectively. At the structural scale, the predicted peak capacity of reinforced concrete beams decreases from 470 to 360 and 175 kN over the same range, consistent with test data. A fire-protection design study further shows that, for the specific column geometry and loading condition analysed, a 20 mm coating provides the most favourable balance between capacity retention and material cost for achieving an R120 rating. The proposed framework offers a physically based tool for assessing the high-temperature performance of concrete.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Materials
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2026.1938234
Primary Topic
Fire effects on concrete materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Separated thermal–mechanical damage modelling of concrete at elevated temperatures: formulation, ABAQUS implementation, and fire performance prediction

Shuqi Zhan
2 links
Frontiers in Materials
Fire effects on concrete materials
article

Separated thermal–mechanical damage modelling of concrete at elevated temperatures: formulation, ABAQUS implementation, and fire performance prediction

Shuqi Zhan
article en

Abstract

Predicting the response of concrete to fire remains difficult because of the complex, coupled thermal and mechanical damage that develops at elevated temperatures, which existing constitutive models often treat in a lumped or inconsistent manner. This study develops a thermodynamically consistent damage–plasticity model in which thermal and mechanical damage evolve through independent, energy-based laws, coupled with temperature-dependent plasticity and a full strain decomposition that includes thermal expansion and transient creep. The model is implemented as an ABAQUS UMAT subroutine to enable analysis from the material to the structural scale. Model predictions were validated against published experimental data over the range 20–600 °C. At the material scale, the predicted compressive strength decreases from 39 MPa at ambient temperature to 30 MPa (77%) at 400 °C and 14 MPa (36%) at 600 °C, while the thermal damage variable reaches 0.36 and 0.75, respectively. At the structural scale, the predicted peak capacity of reinforced concrete beams decreases from 470 to 360 and 175 kN over the same range, consistent with test data. A fire-protection design study further shows that, for the specific column geometry and loading condition analysed, a 20 mm coating provides the most favourable balance between capacity retention and material cost for achieving an R120 rating. The proposed framework offers a physically based tool for assessing the high-temperature performance of concrete.

Frontiers in MaterialsVol. 13
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Fire effects on concrete materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon