Enhancing General‐Purpose Visual Inspection With a Vision‐Language Model

ABSTRACT Research on applying Vision‐Language Models (VLM) to automate visual inspection has attracted growing attention. However, off‐the‐shelf VLMs lack the domain‐specific expertise required to handle the wide variety of products and defects encountered in industrial inspection, making high‐accuracy judgment difficult without additional training. In this study, we automatically construct dialog‐style training data from a diverse set of images—including products not covered by existing evaluation benchmarks—using GPT‐4o, and fine‐tune a VLM (LLaVA‐OneVision) with the generated data. Experimental results on the MMAD benchmark under zero‐shot and one‐shot settings show improved average accuracy across multiple tasks including good/bad decisions. In particular, we observe notable performance gains on MVTec AD and VisA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronics and Communications in Japan
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ecj.70058
Primary Topic
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing General‐Purpose Visual Inspection With a Vision‐Language Model

Kunihito Kato, Yoshikazu Hayashi, Shiryu Ueno, Hideaki OMOTE et al.
5 links
Electronics and Communications in Japan
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
article

Enhancing General‐Purpose Visual Inspection With a Vision‐Language Model

Kunihito Kato, Yoshikazu Hayashi, Shiryu Ueno, Hideaki OMOTE, Hiroto TSUCHIDA, Kousaku Ohsawa
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Research on applying Vision‐Language Models (VLM) to automate visual inspection has attracted growing attention. However, off‐the‐shelf VLMs lack the domain‐specific expertise required to handle the wide variety of products and defects encountered in industrial inspection, making high‐accuracy judgment difficult without additional training. In this study, we automatically construct dialog‐style training data from a diverse set of images—including products not covered by existing evaluation benchmarks—using GPT‐4o, and fine‐tune a VLM (LLaVA‐OneVision) with the generated data. Experimental results on the MMAD benchmark under zero‐shot and one‐shot settings show improved average accuracy across multiple tasks including good/bad decisions. In particular, we observe notable performance gains on MVTec AD and VisA.

Electronics and Communications in Japan
Gifu University (JP)
New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon