Using Generative AI for Behavioural Research Effectively and Responsibly: a BR-UK Statement

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used across the behavioural research lifecycle. It may improve the efficiency and quality of research, but rapid, uncritical adoption carries risks to research integrity: algorithmic bias, ethical concerns around consent, privacy and plagiarism, erosion of researchers’ skills and public trust, and environmental costs. This Open Letter presents Behavioural Research UK’s (BR-UK) statement on using generative AI effectively and responsibly in behavioural research. It was informed by existing guidance and expert consultation. The statement sets out BR-UK’s four key propositions: (1) research ethics and integrity principles must include AI concerns; (2) AI should assist, but not replace, researchers through a human-in-the-loop approach; (3) rigorous evaluation of AI use is essential; and (4) coordinated stakeholder action is needed to move from identifying risks to practical solutions. It then provides recommendations and points to practical tools, such as decision aids and checklists for declaring AI use, for seven stakeholder groups, namely research-generating institutions, funders, publication outlets, behavioural research networks and communities, AI platform and tool providers, individual researchers, and research users. The statement will be reviewed annually until 2028, the duration of BR-UK, as technology and evidence evolve.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wellcome Open Research
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.27597.1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using Generative AI for Behavioural Research Effectively and Responsibly: a BR-UK Statement

Amy Rodger, Janna Hastings, Liam D. Delaney, Mareike Schomerus et al.
4 links
Wellcome Open Research
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Using Generative AI for Behavioural Research Effectively and Responsibly: a BR-UK Statement

Amy Rodger, Janna Hastings, Liam D. Delaney, Mareike Schomerus, Robert West, Susan Michie, Guanyu Yang
article en

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used across the behavioural research lifecycle. It may improve the efficiency and quality of research, but rapid, uncritical adoption carries risks to research integrity: algorithmic bias, ethical concerns around consent, privacy and plagiarism, erosion of researchers’ skills and public trust, and environmental costs. This Open Letter presents Behavioural Research UK’s (BR-UK) statement on using generative AI effectively and responsibly in behavioural research. It was informed by existing guidance and expert consultation. The statement sets out BR-UK’s four key propositions: (1) research ethics and integrity principles must include AI concerns; (2) AI should assist, but not replace, researchers through a human-in-the-loop approach; (3) rigorous evaluation of AI use is essential; and (4) coordinated stakeholder action is needed to move from identifying risks to practical solutions. It then provides recommendations and points to practical tools, such as decision aids and checklists for declaring AI use, for seven stakeholder groups, namely research-generating institutions, funders, publication outlets, behavioural research networks and communities, AI platform and tool providers, individual researchers, and research users. The statement will be reviewed annually until 2028, the duration of BR-UK, as technology and evidence evolve.

Wellcome Open ResearchVol. 11
Busara Center for Behavioral Economics (KE), University College London (GB), Idiap Research Institute (CH), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Wellcome Trust, Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon