Dynamical Solar Wind Forecasting Using In Situ Solar Wind Speed Observations

Abstract Accurate prediction of the ambient solar wind at Earth is a key requirement for space‐weather forecasting but is limited by uncertainties in coronal boundary conditions and, to a lesser extent, heliospheric transport. We present a quantitative assessment of a solar wind forecast that uses near‐Earth in situ solar wind observations to estimate the inner boundary condition for the Heliospheric Upwind eXtrapolation with Time dependence (HUXt) model. In terms of the accuracy at Earth, this method is very similar to 27‐day recurrence forecasting. However, unlike 27‐day recurrence, it produces a solution throughout the heliosphere that can potentially be used to improve CME propagation estimates and forecasting at a range of near‐ecliptic heliospheric locations. To test this forecast method, daily hindcasts are generated over a 15‐year interval spanning 2008–2022. Performance is directly compared with forecasts generated by the standard operational forecast approach, namely Global Oscillations Network Group (GONG) magnetogram‐based estimates using the Wang–Sheeley–Arge (WSA) coronal model. The InSitu‐HUXt hindcasts achieve mean absolute error (MAE) in solar wind speed of 65 km for lead times up to 27 days. WSA‐HUXt hindcasts are most accurate around 4‐day lead time, with an MAE of around 85 km . More diagnostic metrics show that this is partly because InSitu‐HUXt naturally produces a bias‐free prediction, whereas WSA‐HUXt over‐predicts the occurrence of high‐speed streams in the solar wind by around 30%. Thus InSitu‐HUXt provides a valuable independent method to forecast near‐Earth solar wind conditions and can be used even when magnetogram data is unavailable, providing forecast resilience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Space Weather
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2026sw005080
Primary Topic
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamical Solar Wind Forecasting Using In Situ Solar Wind Speed Observations

Luke Barnard, Mathew J. Owens, C. N. Arge, Harriet M Turner
3 links
Space Weather
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
article

Dynamical Solar Wind Forecasting Using In Situ Solar Wind Speed Observations

Luke Barnard, Mathew J. Owens, C. N. Arge, Harriet M Turner
article en

Abstract

Abstract Accurate prediction of the ambient solar wind at Earth is a key requirement for space‐weather forecasting but is limited by uncertainties in coronal boundary conditions and, to a lesser extent, heliospheric transport. We present a quantitative assessment of a solar wind forecast that uses near‐Earth in situ solar wind observations to estimate the inner boundary condition for the Heliospheric Upwind eXtrapolation with Time dependence (HUXt) model. In terms of the accuracy at Earth, this method is very similar to 27‐day recurrence forecasting. However, unlike 27‐day recurrence, it produces a solution throughout the heliosphere that can potentially be used to improve CME propagation estimates and forecasting at a range of near‐ecliptic heliospheric locations. To test this forecast method, daily hindcasts are generated over a 15‐year interval spanning 2008–2022. Performance is directly compared with forecasts generated by the standard operational forecast approach, namely Global Oscillations Network Group (GONG) magnetogram‐based estimates using the Wang–Sheeley–Arge (WSA) coronal model. The InSitu‐HUXt hindcasts achieve mean absolute error (MAE) in solar wind speed of 65 km for lead times up to 27 days. WSA‐HUXt hindcasts are most accurate around 4‐day lead time, with an MAE of around 85 km . More diagnostic metrics show that this is partly because InSitu‐HUXt naturally produces a bias‐free prediction, whereas WSA‐HUXt over‐predicts the occurrence of high‐speed streams in the solar wind by around 30%. Thus InSitu‐HUXt provides a valuable independent method to forecast near‐Earth solar wind conditions and can be used even when magnetogram data is unavailable, providing forecast resilience.

Space WeatherVol. 24(11)
Met Office (GB), Goddard Space Flight Center (US), Heliophysics Science Division (US), University of Reading (GB)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Goddard Space Flight Center, Natural Environment Research Council, Science and Technology Facilities Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon