Rethinking the economic regulation of wastewater reuse in an era of emerging but unpredictable risks

This paper considers the dilemma of wastewater reuse through the lens of Australian economic regulation. We explore the potential conflicts between the mechanisms built into ‘building block’ approaches to price setting, the proclivity of regulators to resist speculative projects and the shift in some Australian jurisdictions to place greater credence on the preferences of customers. We argue that wastewater utilities might legitimately seek to invest to reduce the likelihood of harm from emerging contaminants in wastewater, even if environmental and health regulators cannot accurately articulate risks. We find that application of business-as-usual economic regulation can stifle investment in wastewater treatment infrastructure, potentially leaving utilities ill-equipped to manage the emerging risk. We call for additional research to better understand the risk preferences of the communities that ultimately pay for wastewater services, as this can inform more efficient investment decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australasian Journal of Water Resources
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13241583.2026.2751281
Primary Topic
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking the economic regulation of wastewater reuse in an era of emerging but unpredictable risks

Lin Crase, Ben van den Akker, Bethany Cooper, Harry R. Clarke
1 links
Australasian Journal of Water Resources
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
article

Rethinking the economic regulation of wastewater reuse in an era of emerging but unpredictable risks

Lin Crase, Ben van den Akker, Bethany Cooper, Harry R. Clarke
article en

Abstract

This paper considers the dilemma of wastewater reuse through the lens of Australian economic regulation. We explore the potential conflicts between the mechanisms built into ‘building block’ approaches to price setting, the proclivity of regulators to resist speculative projects and the shift in some Australian jurisdictions to place greater credence on the preferences of customers. We argue that wastewater utilities might legitimately seek to invest to reduce the likelihood of harm from emerging contaminants in wastewater, even if environmental and health regulators cannot accurately articulate risks. We find that application of business-as-usual economic regulation can stifle investment in wastewater treatment infrastructure, potentially leaving utilities ill-equipped to manage the emerging risk. We call for additional research to better understand the risk preferences of the communities that ultimately pay for wastewater services, as this can inform more efficient investment decisions.

Australasian Journal of Water Resources
La Trobe University (AU), Adelaide University (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Australian Research Council
Clean water and sanitation, Responsible consumption and production, Sustainable cities and communities, Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon