Calculation and correction of the eye-lens dosemeter response at non-calibration photon energies

Abstract In this article, the calibration curve of GR-200 TLDs (Thermo-Luminescent Dosemeters) as eye-lens dosemeters was experimentally generated in a standard $^{137}$Cs field. Subsequently, the energy and angular responses of TLDs positioned on the ISO cylindrical head phantom were calculated using Geant4 simulation toolkit. The results indicated that the response at energies below 200 keV deviates by $\sim$1.85 times compared with that at 662 keV. Furthermore, the responses to 70 kVp and 120 kVp X-rays used in angiography were 1.65 and 1.61 times greater, respectively. The responses to these X-rays were also found to be independent of the irradiation angle between 0$^{\circ }$ and 75$^{\circ }$, with a maximum deviation of 28%. Finally, a correction method based on the relative energy response of GR-200 TLDs was proposed to adjust their response at photon energies or spectra different from the calibration field, thereby improving the accuracy of H$_{p}$(3) assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiation Protection Dosimetry
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncag091
Primary Topic
Radiation Dose and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Calculation and correction of the eye-lens dosemeter response at non-calibration photon energies

Amir Moslehi, Samaneh Baradaran, Mehran Taheri, Aram Rostami
Radiation Protection Dosimetry
Radiation Dose and Imaging
article

Calculation and correction of the eye-lens dosemeter response at non-calibration photon energies

Amir Moslehi, Samaneh Baradaran, Mehran Taheri, Aram Rostami
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this article, the calibration curve of GR-200 TLDs (Thermo-Luminescent Dosemeters) as eye-lens dosemeters was experimentally generated in a standard $^{137}$Cs field. Subsequently, the energy and angular responses of TLDs positioned on the ISO cylindrical head phantom were calculated using Geant4 simulation toolkit. The results indicated that the response at energies below 200 keV deviates by $\sim$1.85 times compared with that at 662 keV. Furthermore, the responses to 70 kVp and 120 kVp X-rays used in angiography were 1.65 and 1.61 times greater, respectively. The responses to these X-rays were also found to be independent of the irradiation angle between 0$^{\circ }$ and 75$^{\circ }$, with a maximum deviation of 28%. Finally, a correction method based on the relative energy response of GR-200 TLDs was proposed to adjust their response at photon energies or spectra different from the calibration field, thereby improving the accuracy of H$_{p}$(3) assessment.

Radiation Protection Dosimetry
National Center for Cancer Care and Research (QA), Applications Research (United States) (US), Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Radiation Dose and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Calculation and correction of the eye-lens dosemeter response at non-calibration photon energies — Amir Moslehi, Samaneh Baradaran, et al. · Radiation Protection Dosimetry (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS