Clinical and Imaging Characteristics and Short-Term Outcomes in Patients with Recurrent Varicose Veins: A Single-Center Descriptive Retrospective Study

Background: The reported postoperative recurrence rates of lower limb varicose veins differ considerably across studies, ranging from 7% to 62%. This study aimed to characterize the clinical and imaging findings in patients presenting with recurrent varicose veins (RVVs) and to describe short-term clinical outcomes after individualized reintervention. Methods: We enrolled 99 patients (114 lower extremities) with RVVs admitted from January 2018 to June 2025. All patients underwent duplex ultrasound scanning; computed tomography venography or magnetic resonance venography was performed to assess iliac vein anatomy. We analyzed the charts of patients for the prevalence of imaging and clinical abnormalities among patients with RVVs. This study was designed as a descriptive retrospective case series without a non-recurrent control group. We analyzed the distribution of venous abnormalities among the included limbs. Results: The mean patient age was 63.9 ± 9.8 years, and 71.7% of the patients were female. Among the 114 affected limbs, residual great saphenous vein trunks were identified in 55 (48.3%), deep venous reflux in 47 (41.2%), incompetent perforating veins in 7 (6.1%), anterior accessory great saphenous vein reflux in 2 (1.8%), and small saphenous vein reflux in 2 (1.8%). Iliac vein stenosis was suspected in 42 limbs, of which 38 underwent digital subtraction angiography; nonthrombotic iliac vein compression lesions were confirmed in 31 limbs. Confirmed lesions were more frequent in left-sided than right-sided RVVs limbs (35.8% vs. 16.3%; p = 0.03). The median venous clinical severity score decreased from 7 (interquartile range, 5–10) at admission to 2 (interquartile range, 2–3) 6 months after discharge (p < 0.01). All 20 active venous ulcers healed during follow-up. Conclusions: Residual great saphenous vein trunks, deep venous valve insufficiency, and nonthrombotic iliac vein compression lesions were frequently observed venous abnormalities in this retrospective descriptive case series of patients with RVVs. Comprehensive multimodal venous imaging may assist individualized reintervention planning. These findings describe a referred recurrent case series and cannot be interpreted as risk factors for recurrence without a non-recurrent control group. Long-term outcomes require further investigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vascular Diseases
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jvd5060047
Primary Topic
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical and Imaging Characteristics and Short-Term Outcomes in Patients with Recurrent Varicose Veins: A Single-Center Descriptive Retrospective Study

Shichai Hong, 彭亚, Fanzhen Lv, Weifeng Lu et al.
1 links
Journal of Vascular Diseases
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
article

Clinical and Imaging Characteristics and Short-Term Outcomes in Patients with Recurrent Varicose Veins: A Single-Center Descriptive Retrospective Study

Shichai Hong, 彭亚, Fanzhen Lv, Weifeng Lu, Xiang Hong, Xinsheng Xie, Yue Lin, Tong Yuan, Gang Chen
article en

Abstract

Background: The reported postoperative recurrence rates of lower limb varicose veins differ considerably across studies, ranging from 7% to 62%. This study aimed to characterize the clinical and imaging findings in patients presenting with recurrent varicose veins (RVVs) and to describe short-term clinical outcomes after individualized reintervention. Methods: We enrolled 99 patients (114 lower extremities) with RVVs admitted from January 2018 to June 2025. All patients underwent duplex ultrasound scanning; computed tomography venography or magnetic resonance venography was performed to assess iliac vein anatomy. We analyzed the charts of patients for the prevalence of imaging and clinical abnormalities among patients with RVVs. This study was designed as a descriptive retrospective case series without a non-recurrent control group. We analyzed the distribution of venous abnormalities among the included limbs. Results: The mean patient age was 63.9 ± 9.8 years, and 71.7% of the patients were female. Among the 114 affected limbs, residual great saphenous vein trunks were identified in 55 (48.3%), deep venous reflux in 47 (41.2%), incompetent perforating veins in 7 (6.1%), anterior accessory great saphenous vein reflux in 2 (1.8%), and small saphenous vein reflux in 2 (1.8%). Iliac vein stenosis was suspected in 42 limbs, of which 38 underwent digital subtraction angiography; nonthrombotic iliac vein compression lesions were confirmed in 31 limbs. Confirmed lesions were more frequent in left-sided than right-sided RVVs limbs (35.8% vs. 16.3%; p = 0.03). The median venous clinical severity score decreased from 7 (interquartile range, 5–10) at admission to 2 (interquartile range, 2–3) 6 months after discharge (p < 0.01). All 20 active venous ulcers healed during follow-up. Conclusions: Residual great saphenous vein trunks, deep venous valve insufficiency, and nonthrombotic iliac vein compression lesions were frequently observed venous abnormalities in this retrospective descriptive case series of patients with RVVs. Comprehensive multimodal venous imaging may assist individualized reintervention planning. These findings describe a referred recurrent case series and cannot be interpreted as risk factors for recurrence without a non-recurrent control group. Long-term outcomes require further investigation.

Journal of Vascular DiseasesVol. 5(6)
Fudan University (CN), Zhongshan Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon