Texture Analysis of Multiplanar Reconstruction Images from CT Colonography for Differentiating Colorectal Adenomas from Adenocarcinomas

This study aimed to evaluate whether texture analyses applied to multiplanar reconstruction images from computed tomographic colonography can improve differentiation between colorectal adenomas and adenocarcinomas. This retrospective study included 152 patients who underwent computed tomographic colonography for colorectal lesion evaluation at our institution between April 2021 and September 2024. Computed tomographic colonography was performed with and without a contrast medium. All 242 lesions were imaged and analysed on both plain (PCTC) and contrast-enhanced (CECTC) computed tomographic colonography; no lesion was available on only one modality. The two modalities were therefore derived from the same lesion set, and identical denominators (242 lesions: 152 adenomas and 90 adenocarcinomas) were used for each modality. Intramucosal carcinoma was counted as malignant in accordance with the Japanese classification. Protrusions were identified on virtual endoscopic images, and regions of interest were manually delineated on the maximum area of two-dimensional multiplanar reconstruction images. Texture analyses, including histogram analysis, fractal analysis and the gray-level co-occurrence matrices, were applied. These texture parameters were compared between adenomas andadenocarcinomas. Diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Interobserver reproducibility was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients, with all parameters demonstrating ICC ≥ 0.75. A total of 242 lesions (152 adenomas and 90 adenocarcinomas) were included. All texture parameters showed significant differences in differentiation between adenomas and adenocarcinomas on both non-contrast computed tomographic colonography and contrast-enhanced computed tomographic colonography. On plain computed tomographic colonography, GLCM entropy showed the highest diagnostic performance (area under the curve, 0.833; sensitivity, 0.856; specificity, 0.750). On contrast-enhanced computed tomographic colonography, GLCM entropy demonstrated the highest area under the curve (0.811; sensitivity, 0.689; specificity, 0.862). Texture parameters on multiplanar reconstruction images of computed tomographic colonography can effectively distinguish between adenoma and adenocarcinoma, particularly using gray-level co-occurrence matrix entropy. Integrating textural feature analysis into computed tomographic colonography may improve diagnostic performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Techniques in Coloproctology
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-026-03452-z
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Texture Analysis of Multiplanar Reconstruction Images from CT Colonography for Differentiating Colorectal Adenomas from Adenocarcinomas

Atsushi Hirata, Gaku Ohira, Koichi Hayano, Tetsuro Maruyama et al.
1 links
Techniques in Coloproctology
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
article

Texture Analysis of Multiplanar Reconstruction Images from CT Colonography for Differentiating Colorectal Adenomas from Adenocarcinomas

Atsushi Hirata, Gaku Ohira, Koichi Hayano, Tetsuro Maruyama, Y. Kurata, Moe Iwata, Toru Tochigi, Ayano Kakimoto, Michihiro Maruyama, Ryota Miura, Yuko Ikeda
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate whether texture analyses applied to multiplanar reconstruction images from computed tomographic colonography can improve differentiation between colorectal adenomas and adenocarcinomas. This retrospective study included 152 patients who underwent computed tomographic colonography for colorectal lesion evaluation at our institution between April 2021 and September 2024. Computed tomographic colonography was performed with and without a contrast medium. All 242 lesions were imaged and analysed on both plain (PCTC) and contrast-enhanced (CECTC) computed tomographic colonography; no lesion was available on only one modality. The two modalities were therefore derived from the same lesion set, and identical denominators (242 lesions: 152 adenomas and 90 adenocarcinomas) were used for each modality. Intramucosal carcinoma was counted as malignant in accordance with the Japanese classification. Protrusions were identified on virtual endoscopic images, and regions of interest were manually delineated on the maximum area of two-dimensional multiplanar reconstruction images. Texture analyses, including histogram analysis, fractal analysis and the gray-level co-occurrence matrices, were applied. These texture parameters were compared between adenomas andadenocarcinomas. Diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Interobserver reproducibility was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients, with all parameters demonstrating ICC ≥ 0.75. A total of 242 lesions (152 adenomas and 90 adenocarcinomas) were included. All texture parameters showed significant differences in differentiation between adenomas and adenocarcinomas on both non-contrast computed tomographic colonography and contrast-enhanced computed tomographic colonography. On plain computed tomographic colonography, GLCM entropy showed the highest diagnostic performance (area under the curve, 0.833; sensitivity, 0.856; specificity, 0.750). On contrast-enhanced computed tomographic colonography, GLCM entropy demonstrated the highest area under the curve (0.811; sensitivity, 0.689; specificity, 0.862). Texture parameters on multiplanar reconstruction images of computed tomographic colonography can effectively distinguish between adenoma and adenocarcinoma, particularly using gray-level co-occurrence matrix entropy. Integrating textural feature analysis into computed tomographic colonography may improve diagnostic performance.

Techniques in Coloproctology
Chiba University (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon