Childhood trauma and dimensions of criminal thinking in individuals referred for forensic psychiatric evaluation

Abstract Childhood trauma has been consistently associated with criminal behavior, yet its relationship with criminal thinking remains understudied. This single‐center, cross‐sectional study examined the associations between childhood trauma and dimensions of criminal thinking among individuals referred for criminal responsibility evaluation. Eighty‐four individuals evaluated at the Observation Department of the Council of Forensic Medicine, a national referral center in Türkiye, completed the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire–Short Form and the Criminal Thinking Scale. Associations between the total and subscale scores were examined using correlation analysis followed by simple linear regression analysis. Mean age of the participants was 36.98 ± 10.79 years. CTS total score was not significantly associated with the CTQ‐SF total or subscale scores. Power Orientation was the only criminal‐thinking dimension significantly associated with the total childhood trauma score ( ρ = 0.318, p = 0.003). Power Orientation was also positively correlated with emotional abuse ( ρ = 0.334, p = 0.002) and sexual abuse ( ρ = 0.290, p = 0.007). In the unadjusted regression model, higher total childhood trauma scores were associated with higher Power Orientation scores ( β = 0.338, p = 0.002), accounting for 11.4% of the variance ( R 2 = 0.114); the association remained significant after adjustment for age, education, substance use, prior incarceration, and offense group ( β = 0.326, p = 0.002, model R 2 = 0.254). These findings indicate that childhood trauma may be associated with specific dimensions of criminal thinking rather than generalized criminal cognition. Associations of emotional and sexual abuse with power‐oriented thinking suggest that different forms of childhood trauma may be linked to distinct offense‐related cognitive styles and support the potential value of trauma‐informed approaches in forensic psychiatric assessment and rehabilitation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Forensic Sciences
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.70514
Primary Topic
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Childhood trauma and dimensions of criminal thinking in individuals referred for forensic psychiatric evaluation

Ali Tarık Altunç, Şenol Turan, Oğuzhan Koyuncu, Muhammed Emin Boylu et al.
2 links
Journal of Forensic Sciences
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
article

Childhood trauma and dimensions of criminal thinking in individuals referred for forensic psychiatric evaluation

Ali Tarık Altunç, Şenol Turan, Oğuzhan Koyuncu, Muhammed Emin Boylu, Muhammed Demirel, Hüseyin Çağrı Şahin, Zeynep Merzifonlu, Ahmet Naim Namlı, Faruk Kırbıyık, Ümit Çiçek
article en

Abstract

Abstract Childhood trauma has been consistently associated with criminal behavior, yet its relationship with criminal thinking remains understudied. This single‐center, cross‐sectional study examined the associations between childhood trauma and dimensions of criminal thinking among individuals referred for criminal responsibility evaluation. Eighty‐four individuals evaluated at the Observation Department of the Council of Forensic Medicine, a national referral center in Türkiye, completed the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire–Short Form and the Criminal Thinking Scale. Associations between the total and subscale scores were examined using correlation analysis followed by simple linear regression analysis. Mean age of the participants was 36.98 ± 10.79 years. CTS total score was not significantly associated with the CTQ‐SF total or subscale scores. Power Orientation was the only criminal‐thinking dimension significantly associated with the total childhood trauma score ( ρ = 0.318, p = 0.003). Power Orientation was also positively correlated with emotional abuse ( ρ = 0.334, p = 0.002) and sexual abuse ( ρ = 0.290, p = 0.007). In the unadjusted regression model, higher total childhood trauma scores were associated with higher Power Orientation scores ( β = 0.338, p = 0.002), accounting for 11.4% of the variance ( R 2 = 0.114); the association remained significant after adjustment for age, education, substance use, prior incarceration, and offense group ( β = 0.326, p = 0.002, model R 2 = 0.254). These findings indicate that childhood trauma may be associated with specific dimensions of criminal thinking rather than generalized criminal cognition. Associations of emotional and sexual abuse with power‐oriented thinking suggest that different forms of childhood trauma may be linked to distinct offense‐related cognitive styles and support the potential value of trauma‐informed approaches in forensic psychiatric assessment and rehabilitation.

Journal of Forensic Sciences
Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa (TR), Ministry of Justice (TR), Ibn Haldun University (TR), Devon Partnership NHS Trust (GB), Istanbul Medeniyet University (TR)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon