The Austrian Theory of the Business Cycle: A Critical Analysis in a Schumpeter–Keynes Perspective

The global financial crisis of 2007–2008 and the subsequent Great Recession have led to a renewed interest in the Austrian theory of the business cycle. This interest depends on the fact that the explanation of the origins of the Great Recession necessarily requires a theory in which the financial system represents a source of instability. The objective of this work is to show that the Austrian theory of the business cycle does not represent a valid instrument to explain the functioning of contemporary economies. The fundamental limit of this theory is that it is based on the Wicksellian concept of natural rate of interest as, according to the Austrian theory, crises are the outcome of a disequilibrium between the rate of interest on money and the natural rate. Following the lesson of Schumpeter and Keynes, the article underlines the irrelevance of the concept of natural rate of interest and the impossibility of stating that the Great Recession has been caused by the decision of the Fed to set the monetary rate of interest below the natural rate. Furthermore, the article contains an explanation of the origins of the global financial crisis sounder than that developed by the Austrian school.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Political Economy
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2026.2746453
Primary Topic
Economic Theory and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Austrian Theory of the Business Cycle: A Critical Analysis in a Schumpeter–Keynes Perspective

Giancarlo Bertocco, Andrea Kalajzić
Review of Political Economy
Economic Theory and Policy
article

The Austrian Theory of the Business Cycle: A Critical Analysis in a Schumpeter–Keynes Perspective

Giancarlo Bertocco, Andrea Kalajzić
article en

Abstract

The global financial crisis of 2007–2008 and the subsequent Great Recession have led to a renewed interest in the Austrian theory of the business cycle. This interest depends on the fact that the explanation of the origins of the Great Recession necessarily requires a theory in which the financial system represents a source of instability. The objective of this work is to show that the Austrian theory of the business cycle does not represent a valid instrument to explain the functioning of contemporary economies. The fundamental limit of this theory is that it is based on the Wicksellian concept of natural rate of interest as, according to the Austrian theory, crises are the outcome of a disequilibrium between the rate of interest on money and the natural rate. Following the lesson of Schumpeter and Keynes, the article underlines the irrelevance of the concept of natural rate of interest and the impossibility of stating that the Great Recession has been caused by the decision of the Fed to set the monetary rate of interest below the natural rate. Furthermore, the article contains an explanation of the origins of the global financial crisis sounder than that developed by the Austrian school.

Review of Political Economy
University of Insubria (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Economic Theory and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon