The Space Between: Relational Foundations of Collaborative Knowledge Worth Making

This essay is a scholarly argument in the form of an imagined letter to a promotion and tenure committee—never requested, but necessary. It contends that collaborative, co-authored scholarship is not a lesser form of academic production, but its most rigorous and ethically grounded expression. Drawing on cognitive science research demonstrating that thinking is fundamentally social, and centering Indigenous scholars who have asserted this truth for generations before Western science had language to name it, the essay argues that institutional processes privileging single-authored work reproduce the very logics of extraction, individualism, and epistemic colonialism that relational research seeks to disrupt. Through engagement with co-authored works centering synergistic conversations, epistemologies of family, Indigenous research methodologies, and Projects in Humanization, this essay calls on promotion and tenure committees and university structures to reimagine what counts as scholarly worth—and to recognize that the most consequential knowledge emerges not from solitary thinking, but from the generative spaces held between people in genuine relation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qualitative Inquiry
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004261484551
Primary Topic
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Space Between: Relational Foundations of Collaborative Knowledge Worth Making

Timothy San Pedro
2 links
Qualitative Inquiry
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
article

The Space Between: Relational Foundations of Collaborative Knowledge Worth Making

Timothy San Pedro
article en

Abstract

This essay is a scholarly argument in the form of an imagined letter to a promotion and tenure committee—never requested, but necessary. It contends that collaborative, co-authored scholarship is not a lesser form of academic production, but its most rigorous and ethically grounded expression. Drawing on cognitive science research demonstrating that thinking is fundamentally social, and centering Indigenous scholars who have asserted this truth for generations before Western science had language to name it, the essay argues that institutional processes privileging single-authored work reproduce the very logics of extraction, individualism, and epistemic colonialism that relational research seeks to disrupt. Through engagement with co-authored works centering synergistic conversations, epistemologies of family, Indigenous research methodologies, and Projects in Humanization, this essay calls on promotion and tenure committees and university structures to reimagine what counts as scholarly worth—and to recognize that the most consequential knowledge emerges not from solitary thinking, but from the generative spaces held between people in genuine relation.

Qualitative Inquiry
The Ohio State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon