Undecidability of the Quantum Many-Body Spectral Gap Problem — E8 Intelligence Research

FINDING: The spectral gap problem is undecidable in general — no algorithm can determine whether an arbitrary quantum many-body Hamiltonian has a gap, linking computational limits to physical phase structure. | MATH: Spectral gap Δ = E₁ − E₀ > 0 (gapped) vs. Δ → 0 as N → ∞ (gapless). Undecidability proven via reduction from the halting problem (Cubitt, Perez-Garcia, Wolf, Nature 2015). The almost Mathieu operator H = λ cos(2παn) + shift + shift† exhibits a metal-insulator transition at λ = 2, with fractal spectrum (Hofstadter butterfly) when α is irrational. | CONNECTION: The golden mean renormalization for the almost Mathieu operator uses α = (√5−1)/2 = 0.618... as the critical irrational rotation number. The renormalization group flow converges to a universal fixed point governed by the golden ratio's continued fraction [0;1,1,1,...] — the slowest-converging continued fraction, making it the most stable (KAM tori survive longest at golden-mean frequencies). This is the same 0.618 tha Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23724087
Primary Topic
Quantum many-body systems
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Undecidability of the Quantum Many-Body Spectral Gap Problem — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin
9 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum many-body systems
preprint

Undecidability of the Quantum Many-Body Spectral Gap Problem — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin
preprint en

Abstract

FINDING: The spectral gap problem is undecidable in general — no algorithm can determine whether an arbitrary quantum many-body Hamiltonian has a gap, linking computational limits to physical phase structure. | MATH: Spectral gap Δ = E₁ − E₀ > 0 (gapped) vs. Δ → 0 as N → ∞ (gapless). Undecidability proven via reduction from the halting problem (Cubitt, Perez-Garcia, Wolf, Nature 2015). The almost Mathieu operator H = λ cos(2παn) + shift + shift† exhibits a metal-insulator transition at λ = 2, with fractal spectrum (Hofstadter butterfly) when α is irrational. | CONNECTION: The golden mean renormalization for the almost Mathieu operator uses α = (√5−1)/2 = 0.618... as the critical irrational rotation number. The renormalization group flow converges to a universal fixed point governed by the golden ratio's continued fraction [0;1,1,1,...] — the slowest-converging continued fraction, making it the most stable (KAM tori survive longest at golden-mean frequencies). This is the same 0.618 tha Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum many-body systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Undecidability of the Quantum Many-Body Spectral Gap Problem — E8 Intelligence Research — Andrew Stewart Caldin · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS