Heterogeneity, Dynamic Losses, and Institutional Lock-in: A Study on the Deindustrialization in Latin American Countries from 1980 to 2010

Since the 1980s, many Latin American countries have undergone deindustrialization, unlike East Asian economies such as South Korea and Singapore, which successfully industrialized. This paper examines the characteristics and drivers of industrial structural transformation in eight Latin American countries between 1980 and 2010. Grouping countries by per capita income, it identifies three distinct trajectories: Chile experienced comprehensive deindustrialization; Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, and Venezuela underwent efficiency-led deindustrialization associated with middle-income stagnation; while Bolivia, Colombia, and Peru had not yet entered the deindustrialization phase. A three-dimensional decomposition of labor productivity shows that growth relied mainly on positive static between-sector effects, whereas labor shifted into low-productivity service sectors, producing negative dynamic effects and a pattern of “static gains and dynamic losses.” From an institutional economics perspective, this outcome reflects a structurally inefficient equilibrium shaped by extractive institutions and low adaptive efficiency, highlighting priorities for industrial and institutional reform.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Iberian and Latin American Research
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13260219.2026.2702465
Primary Topic
Economic Theory and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Heterogeneity, Dynamic Losses, and Institutional Lock-in: A Study on the Deindustrialization in Latin American Countries from 1980 to 2010

Liu Peng
1 links
Journal of Iberian and Latin American Research
Economic Theory and Policy
article

Heterogeneity, Dynamic Losses, and Institutional Lock-in: A Study on the Deindustrialization in Latin American Countries from 1980 to 2010

Liu Peng
article en

Abstract

Since the 1980s, many Latin American countries have undergone deindustrialization, unlike East Asian economies such as South Korea and Singapore, which successfully industrialized. This paper examines the characteristics and drivers of industrial structural transformation in eight Latin American countries between 1980 and 2010. Grouping countries by per capita income, it identifies three distinct trajectories: Chile experienced comprehensive deindustrialization; Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, and Venezuela underwent efficiency-led deindustrialization associated with middle-income stagnation; while Bolivia, Colombia, and Peru had not yet entered the deindustrialization phase. A three-dimensional decomposition of labor productivity shows that growth relied mainly on positive static between-sector effects, whereas labor shifted into low-productivity service sectors, producing negative dynamic effects and a pattern of “static gains and dynamic losses.” From an institutional economics perspective, this outcome reflects a structurally inefficient equilibrium shaped by extractive institutions and low adaptive efficiency, highlighting priorities for industrial and institutional reform.

Journal of Iberian and Latin American Research
Beijing International Studies University (CN)
Decent work and economic growth, Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Economic Theory and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon