Impact of administration timing of subanesthetic doses of esketamine on emergence agitation in patients undergoing nasal endoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial

Introduction Emergence agitation (EA) is a common complication following general anesthesia, particularly after nasal endoscopic surgery with nasal packing. This study investigated whether the administration timing of subanesthetic esketamine influences its efficacy in preventing EA. Methods In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial registered at the China Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR2500115004), 108 adult patients undergoing elective nasal endoscopic surgery were randomized (1:1:1) to receive intravenous normal saline (Group C), esketamine 0.25 mg.kg⁻ 1 during anesthesia induction (Group E1), or esketamine 0.25 mg.kg⁻ 1 20 min before surgical completion (Group E2). The primary outcome was the incidence of EA in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), defined as a Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale (SAS) score ≥ 5. Secondary outcomes included SAS scores, postoperative NRS pain scores, hemodynamics, and adverse events. Results Ninety-five patients completed the study (Group C: n = 32; Group E1: n = 32; Group E2: n = 31). Baseline characteristics were comparable across groups. The overall EA incidence differed significantly among groups (13/32 [40.6%] in C, 8/32 [25.0%] in E1, 3/31 [9.7%] in E2; P = 0.018). Group E2 had a significantly lower EA incidence (absolute risk reduction [ARR], 30.9%, [95% CI, 11.0%–50.9%]; number needed to treat [NNT], 3.2 [95% CI, 2.0–9.1]; P = 0.011) and lower SAS scores (adjusted P = 0.016) than Group C, whereas Group E1 showed no significant difference compared with Group C ( P = 0.287). Postoperative pain scores, rescue analgesia, extubation time, PACU stay, hemodynamic stability, and adverse event rates were comparable across all groups. Conclusions The preventive effect of subanesthetic esketamine on EA is timing-dependent. Administration 20 min before the end of surgery (0.25 mg.kg⁻ 1 IV) significantly reduces EA incidence in nasal endoscopic surgery patients. However, this single-center finding requires multicenter validation, and NRS scales remain limited in capturing packing-related suffocation discomfort. Clinical Trial Registration identifier ChiCTR2500115004.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Medicine
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1978040
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of administration timing of subanesthetic doses of esketamine on emergence agitation in patients undergoing nasal endoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial

Longmei Guo, wenhui chen, Zeting Qiu, Yuxuan Liu et al.
6 links
Frontiers in Medicine
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
article

Impact of administration timing of subanesthetic doses of esketamine on emergence agitation in patients undergoing nasal endoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial

Longmei Guo, wenhui chen, Zeting Qiu, Yuxuan Liu, Yan Zhang, Wei Sun, Shutong Lv, Xiaolan Wen
article en

Abstract

Introduction Emergence agitation (EA) is a common complication following general anesthesia, particularly after nasal endoscopic surgery with nasal packing. This study investigated whether the administration timing of subanesthetic esketamine influences its efficacy in preventing EA. Methods In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial registered at the China Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR2500115004), 108 adult patients undergoing elective nasal endoscopic surgery were randomized (1:1:1) to receive intravenous normal saline (Group C), esketamine 0.25 mg.kg⁻ 1 during anesthesia induction (Group E1), or esketamine 0.25 mg.kg⁻ 1 20 min before surgical completion (Group E2). The primary outcome was the incidence of EA in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), defined as a Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale (SAS) score ≥ 5. Secondary outcomes included SAS scores, postoperative NRS pain scores, hemodynamics, and adverse events. Results Ninety-five patients completed the study (Group C: n = 32; Group E1: n = 32; Group E2: n = 31). Baseline characteristics were comparable across groups. The overall EA incidence differed significantly among groups (13/32 [40.6%] in C, 8/32 [25.0%] in E1, 3/31 [9.7%] in E2; P = 0.018). Group E2 had a significantly lower EA incidence (absolute risk reduction [ARR], 30.9%, [95% CI, 11.0%–50.9%]; number needed to treat [NNT], 3.2 [95% CI, 2.0–9.1]; P = 0.011) and lower SAS scores (adjusted P = 0.016) than Group C, whereas Group E1 showed no significant difference compared with Group C ( P = 0.287). Postoperative pain scores, rescue analgesia, extubation time, PACU stay, hemodynamic stability, and adverse event rates were comparable across all groups. Conclusions The preventive effect of subanesthetic esketamine on EA is timing-dependent. Administration 20 min before the end of surgery (0.25 mg.kg⁻ 1 IV) significantly reduces EA incidence in nasal endoscopic surgery patients. However, this single-center finding requires multicenter validation, and NRS scales remain limited in capturing packing-related suffocation discomfort. Clinical Trial Registration identifier ChiCTR2500115004.

Frontiers in MedicineVol. 13
First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon