Dams not to blame for all reservoir carbon emissions from retained organic carbon

Dams trap organic carbon (OC) and create carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and methane (CH 4 ) emission hotspots within reservoirs, underlying the ongoing debate over their role in carbon emissions. However, even without dams, this labile OC would still decompose and emit CO 2 or CH 4 during downstream transport and after deposition in estuaries. Thus, relying solely on dammed reservoir observations to assess these emissions may introduce considerable bias. Here, we simulated both dammed and non-dammed scenarios for 5346 global reservoir dams to assess their impact on carbon emissions from retained OC. The results show that reservoir-only approaches overestimate dam-induced carbon emissions by neglecting baseline emissions under no-dam conditions. After baseline correction, dams increase carbon emissions by an average of 21.5% in CO 2 -equivalent (CO 2 -eq), which represents only 18.6% of the emissions estimated using the conventional reservoir-based accounting approach. XGBoost identified reservoir depth and hydraulic residence time as the primary controls on dam-induced carbon emissions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Advances
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aeg7676
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dams not to blame for all reservoir carbon emissions from retained organic carbon

Xiangyu Min, Kun� Shi, Qingji Zhang, Wenqing Shi et al.
2 links
Science Advances
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
article

Dams not to blame for all reservoir carbon emissions from retained organic carbon

Xiangyu Min, Kun� Shi, Qingji Zhang, Wenqing Shi, Boqiang Qin, Hans W. Paerl, Erik Jeppesen, Ziqian Li, Lin Zhu
article en

Abstract

Dams trap organic carbon (OC) and create carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and methane (CH 4 ) emission hotspots within reservoirs, underlying the ongoing debate over their role in carbon emissions. However, even without dams, this labile OC would still decompose and emit CO 2 or CH 4 during downstream transport and after deposition in estuaries. Thus, relying solely on dammed reservoir observations to assess these emissions may introduce considerable bias. Here, we simulated both dammed and non-dammed scenarios for 5346 global reservoir dams to assess their impact on carbon emissions from retained OC. The results show that reservoir-only approaches overestimate dam-induced carbon emissions by neglecting baseline emissions under no-dam conditions. After baseline correction, dams increase carbon emissions by an average of 21.5% in CO 2 -equivalent (CO 2 -eq), which represents only 18.6% of the emissions estimated using the conventional reservoir-based accounting approach. XGBoost identified reservoir depth and hydraulic residence time as the primary controls on dam-induced carbon emissions.

Science AdvancesVol. 12(44)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Yunnan University (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (CN), Aarhus University (DK), Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning (CN), Sino-Danish Centre for Education and Research (CN), Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology (CN), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN), State Key Laboratory of Lake Science and Environment (CN), Aarhus University Centre for Water Technology (DK)
National Science Foundation, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Government of Jiangsu Province, Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing University, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Geological Survey, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Climate action, Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon