Applications of Geographic Information Systems in Natural-Resource Management: A Critical Review of Methods, Evidence, Validation and Future Directions

Natural-resource management (NRM) increasingly depends on spatially explicit evidence because land, soil, water, forests and vegetation vary across space and change through time. Geographic Information Systems (GIS), often integrated with remote sensing (RS), provide a common analytical environment for resource inventory, multi-layer integration, change detection, suitability assessment and decision support. This review synthesises a curated corpus of 20 records representing 19 unique studies published between 1995 and 2026; one duplicated Kumar, Yamaç and Velmurugan record was removed before synthesis. The evidence was organised into six domains: (i) planning, decision support and participatory GIS; (ii) multi-sector RS–GIS applications; (iii) soil resources and land degradation; (iv) land-use/land-cover (LULC) change, forests and watershed programmes; (v) water and groundwater; and (vi) agriculture, climate and crop modelling. Across the corpus, overlay analysis, terrain analysis and multi-temporal change detection are the most recurrent GIS functions. Empirical evidence is strongly concentrated in Indian watershed studies. Reported LULC classification accuracies in three case-study groups range from 89.70% to approximately 95%, although these values are not directly comparable because imagery, class schemes and validation designs differ. The synthesis identifies persistent weaknesses in data quality and spatial resolution, field validation, uncertainty reporting, generalisability, subjective weighting in multi-criteria decision-making, limited temporal density, and unequal technical access. Fifteen of the 19 studies explicitly point towards artificial intelligence or machine learning as an emerging opportunity, while UAV/LiDAR data, IoT observations, cloud processing, predictive modelling and participatory web/mobile GIS remain underused. We argue that the next generation of GIS-based NRM should move from static and retrospective mapping towards dynamic, field-validated, uncertainty-aware, predictive and participatory decision systems. A validation-centred framework and a prioritised research agenda are proposed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23721978
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and Land Use
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Applications of Geographic Information Systems in Natural-Resource Management: A Critical Review of Methods, Evidence, Validation and Future Directions

P. A. Pisal, S. R. Ghail, S. M. Mali
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Remote Sensing and Land Use
article

Applications of Geographic Information Systems in Natural-Resource Management: A Critical Review of Methods, Evidence, Validation and Future Directions

P. A. Pisal, S. R. Ghail, S. M. Mali
article en

Abstract

Natural-resource management (NRM) increasingly depends on spatially explicit evidence because land, soil, water, forests and vegetation vary across space and change through time. Geographic Information Systems (GIS), often integrated with remote sensing (RS), provide a common analytical environment for resource inventory, multi-layer integration, change detection, suitability assessment and decision support. This review synthesises a curated corpus of 20 records representing 19 unique studies published between 1995 and 2026; one duplicated Kumar, Yamaç and Velmurugan record was removed before synthesis. The evidence was organised into six domains: (i) planning, decision support and participatory GIS; (ii) multi-sector RS–GIS applications; (iii) soil resources and land degradation; (iv) land-use/land-cover (LULC) change, forests and watershed programmes; (v) water and groundwater; and (vi) agriculture, climate and crop modelling. Across the corpus, overlay analysis, terrain analysis and multi-temporal change detection are the most recurrent GIS functions. Empirical evidence is strongly concentrated in Indian watershed studies. Reported LULC classification accuracies in three case-study groups range from 89.70% to approximately 95%, although these values are not directly comparable because imagery, class schemes and validation designs differ. The synthesis identifies persistent weaknesses in data quality and spatial resolution, field validation, uncertainty reporting, generalisability, subjective weighting in multi-criteria decision-making, limited temporal density, and unequal technical access. Fifteen of the 19 studies explicitly point towards artificial intelligence or machine learning as an emerging opportunity, while UAV/LiDAR data, IoT observations, cloud processing, predictive modelling and participatory web/mobile GIS remain underused. We argue that the next generation of GIS-based NRM should move from static and retrospective mapping towards dynamic, field-validated, uncertainty-aware, predictive and participatory decision systems. A validation-centred framework and a prioritised research agenda are proposed.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Life on land
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Remote Sensing and Land Use
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Applications of Geographic Information Systems in Natural-Resource Management: A Critical Review of Methods, Evidence, Validation and Future Directions — P. A. Pisal, S. R. Ghail, et al. · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS