Mechanical behaviour of Norway spruce fractions in single pellet pressing and consequences for using juvenile wood and branches

Abstract The rising demand for wood fuel pellets and increasing competition for conventional raw materials have intensified interest in alternative forest‑derived feedstocks. In this study, pellets were produced from sawdust originating from four debarked fractions of a single Norway spruce ( Picea abies ) tree: heartwood, sapwood, juvenile wood, and branches. Branches differ chemically and morphologically from stem wood, and their use may influence both pelletizing energy requirements and pellet quality. Pellets were produced using single pellet press systems at moisture contents between 6 and 12% (wb), and energy inputs were quantified as compression ( W comp ), friction ( W fric ), and total ( W tot ) . Pellet quality was evaluated through measurements of solid density, hardness, and mechanical durability. Overall, pellet quality was comparable among the stem‑derived fractions; however, pellets produced from branch material showed markedly inferior properties, e.g., durability and hardness, when processed under conditions optimized for softwood. The branch-derived feedstock also exhibited pronounced differences in cell morphology and chemical composition relative to the stem wood fractions. In several respects, pelletizing branch material appears more similar to pellet production from hardwood than from softwood. The implications of these findings for the utilization of juvenile wood and branches are discussed and recommendations for the industry is presented.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Applied Sciences
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-026-09802-8
Primary Topic
Agricultural and Food Sciences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mechanical behaviour of Norway spruce fractions in single pellet pressing and consequences for using juvenile wood and branches

Magnus Ståhl, Stefan Frodeson, Jonas Berghel, Gunnar Henriksson
1 links
Discover Applied Sciences
Agricultural and Food Sciences
article

Mechanical behaviour of Norway spruce fractions in single pellet pressing and consequences for using juvenile wood and branches

Magnus Ståhl, Stefan Frodeson, Jonas Berghel, Gunnar Henriksson
article en

Abstract

Abstract The rising demand for wood fuel pellets and increasing competition for conventional raw materials have intensified interest in alternative forest‑derived feedstocks. In this study, pellets were produced from sawdust originating from four debarked fractions of a single Norway spruce ( Picea abies ) tree: heartwood, sapwood, juvenile wood, and branches. Branches differ chemically and morphologically from stem wood, and their use may influence both pelletizing energy requirements and pellet quality. Pellets were produced using single pellet press systems at moisture contents between 6 and 12% (wb), and energy inputs were quantified as compression ( W comp ), friction ( W fric ), and total ( W tot ) . Pellet quality was evaluated through measurements of solid density, hardness, and mechanical durability. Overall, pellet quality was comparable among the stem‑derived fractions; however, pellets produced from branch material showed markedly inferior properties, e.g., durability and hardness, when processed under conditions optimized for softwood. The branch-derived feedstock also exhibited pronounced differences in cell morphology and chemical composition relative to the stem wood fractions. In several respects, pelletizing branch material appears more similar to pellet production from hardwood than from softwood. The implications of these findings for the utilization of juvenile wood and branches are discussed and recommendations for the industry is presented.

Discover Applied SciencesVol. 8(11)
Wallenberg Wood Science Center (SE), Karlstad University (SE), KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
Karlstads universitet
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Agricultural and Food Sciences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon