Open Science in an Era of Techno-Nationalism and Intellectual Monopolies – A European Dilemma

The Draghi report, published in September 2024, was meant as a wake-up call for the EU (Draghi, 2024). According to the report, if Europe does not make major changes to its current strategy, it will stagnate and disintegrate. The report shows that income per capita has grown more in the U.S. than in Europe, in the years after the Great Financial Crisis, and that the productivity gap reflects differences in technological capabilities in the digital area. The paper reflects upon how the EU can safeguard its historical commitment to “open science” while engaging in a strategy of catching up with the U.S. and China in digital technologies. It concludes that the principles of open science are valuable for the progress of knowledge and that openness is crucial for tackling planetary crises. But to preserve these, Europe needs to restructure its industry and build digital domestic enterprises to become advanced users of science. JEL Codes: B51, F54

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Innovation Economics & Management
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3917/e.jie.pr2.0212
Primary Topic
Research, Science, and Academia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Open Science in an Era of Techno-Nationalism and Intellectual Monopolies – A European Dilemma

Bengt‐Åke Lundvall
Journal of Innovation Economics & Management
Research, Science, and Academia
article

Open Science in an Era of Techno-Nationalism and Intellectual Monopolies – A European Dilemma

Bengt‐Åke Lundvall
article en

Abstract

The Draghi report, published in September 2024, was meant as a wake-up call for the EU (Draghi, 2024). According to the report, if Europe does not make major changes to its current strategy, it will stagnate and disintegrate. The report shows that income per capita has grown more in the U.S. than in Europe, in the years after the Great Financial Crisis, and that the productivity gap reflects differences in technological capabilities in the digital area. The paper reflects upon how the EU can safeguard its historical commitment to “open science” while engaging in a strategy of catching up with the U.S. and China in digital technologies. It concludes that the principles of open science are valuable for the progress of knowledge and that openness is crucial for tackling planetary crises. But to preserve these, Europe needs to restructure its industry and build digital domestic enterprises to become advanced users of science. JEL Codes: B51, F54

Journal of Innovation Economics & ManagementVol. Prépublication(0)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Research, Science, and Academia
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon