Real-world outcomes of first-line gemcitabine–platinum plus an immune checkpoint inhibitor and subsequent treatment with matched targeted therapy in biliary tract cancer

Background Gemcitabine plus platinum combined with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (GP-ICI) is standard first-line therapy for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC); however, tumor-site distribution, molecular epidemiology, and postprogression treatment access vary globally. We compared real-world outcomes and postprogression treatment patterns between US and South Korean tertiary centers. Patients and methods Patients with advanced BTC receiving first-line GP-ICI at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) or Asan Medical Center (AMC) between 2021 and 2025 were retrospectively analyzed. Outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and postprogression survival (PPS). Molecular profiling and treatment patterns were evaluated. Results Among 375 patients (MDACC, n = 121; AMC, n = 254), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was observed at a higher proportion at MDACC (71.9% versus 42.1%), whereas extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was more common at AMC (10.7% versus 41.7%). ORR (21.5% versus 15.7%), median PFS (6.6 versus 7.2 months), and median OS (19.5 versus 14.9 months) were comparable. Median PPS was significantly longer at MDACC (13.1 versus 5.8 months; P = 0.002). IDH1 mutations and FGFR2 fusions were more common at MDACC, whereas HER2 alterations were more frequent at AMC. Among patients with actionable alterations, matched targeted therapy was administered more frequently at MDACC (75.8% versus 12.8%; P < 0.001) and was associated with significantly longer PPS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06-0.41, P < 0.001] and a trend toward longer OS (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.26-1.10, P = 0.089). Conclusions Real-world GP-ICI outcomes were comparable between US and South Korean cohorts. The differences in molecular profiling, matched targeted therapy utilization, and postprogression outcomes underscore the need for broader molecular profiling and improved targeted therapy access in advanced BTC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmogo.2026.100437
Primary Topic
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world outcomes of first-line gemcitabine–platinum plus an immune checkpoint inhibitor and subsequent treatment with matched targeted therapy in biliary tract cancer

Inkeun Park, Gunn Huh, Milind M. Javle, Hyunseok Yoon et al.
3 links
ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
article

Real-world outcomes of first-line gemcitabine–platinum plus an immune checkpoint inhibitor and subsequent treatment with matched targeted therapy in biliary tract cancer

Inkeun Park, Gunn Huh, Milind M. Javle, Hyunseok Yoon, Quentin Kimana, M. Nuh, T.J. Song, M. Hsiang, S. Lee, K.P. Kim, Y. Lee, D. Oh, H. Jeong, S.H. Cho, C. Yoo
article en

Abstract

Background Gemcitabine plus platinum combined with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (GP-ICI) is standard first-line therapy for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC); however, tumor-site distribution, molecular epidemiology, and postprogression treatment access vary globally. We compared real-world outcomes and postprogression treatment patterns between US and South Korean tertiary centers. Patients and methods Patients with advanced BTC receiving first-line GP-ICI at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) or Asan Medical Center (AMC) between 2021 and 2025 were retrospectively analyzed. Outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and postprogression survival (PPS). Molecular profiling and treatment patterns were evaluated. Results Among 375 patients (MDACC, n = 121; AMC, n = 254), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was observed at a higher proportion at MDACC (71.9% versus 42.1%), whereas extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was more common at AMC (10.7% versus 41.7%). ORR (21.5% versus 15.7%), median PFS (6.6 versus 7.2 months), and median OS (19.5 versus 14.9 months) were comparable. Median PPS was significantly longer at MDACC (13.1 versus 5.8 months; P = 0.002). IDH1 mutations and FGFR2 fusions were more common at MDACC, whereas HER2 alterations were more frequent at AMC. Among patients with actionable alterations, matched targeted therapy was administered more frequently at MDACC (75.8% versus 12.8%; P < 0.001) and was associated with significantly longer PPS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06-0.41, P < 0.001] and a trend toward longer OS (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.26-1.10, P = 0.089). Conclusions Real-world GP-ICI outcomes were comparable between US and South Korean cohorts. The differences in molecular profiling, matched targeted therapy utilization, and postprogression outcomes underscore the need for broader molecular profiling and improved targeted therapy access in advanced BTC.

ESMO Gastrointestinal OncologyVol. 14
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), Asan Medical Center (KR), University of Ulsan (KR)
Kræftens Bekæmpelse
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon