Supra-regional digital cluster as a tool for smoothing inter-regional imbalances

Subject. The impact of digital platforms on the spatial polarization of the Russian economy and the conditions under which they can weaken rather than strengthen interregional imbalances. Objectives. To conceptualize the supra-regional digital cluster as an independent object of regional policy and to show that the resulting impact of platform-cluster integration on territorial inequality is determined by the institutional configuration of the platform, and not by the properties of digital technologies as such. Methods. The method of theoretical synthesis is applied: the provisions of the concept of platform capitalism by N. Srnicek are compared with the model of cumulative causality and endogenous agglomeration, dating back to the works of G. Myrdal and P. Krugman. Additionally, a stylized bi-regional model of value added distribution was built, illustrating two multidirectional scenarios of platform integration. Results. A definition of a supra-regional digital cluster is proposed, distinguishing it from the classical geographically localized (Porter) model and from technological platforms as such. The thesis on the institutional ambivalence of platforms is formulated: the same technology reproduces and enhances agglomeration rents in metropolitan hubs with a centrally distributed design, and ensures network alignment with a federally distributed one. Four mechanisms of transferring the smoothing effect to the territory are revealed: production and cooperative, personnel and labor, technical and standardization, and infrastructural. The stylized example shows that the transition from the first design to the second is able to reduce the inter-regional gap in terms of specific effect by 18-24 percentage points, all other things being equal. Conclusions. The digital platform is not an automatic tool for regional alignment. The smoothing effect is achieved only if three institutional conditions are met: the presence of a distributed node architecture, formalized equality of regional participants in decision-making on platform development, and built-in rules for redistributing the added value created. Without these conditions, platform integration turns into a technologically mediated channel for extracting rent by the center from the periphery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economic Analysis Theory and Practice
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24891/vopcgh
Primary Topic
Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supra-regional digital cluster as a tool for smoothing inter-regional imbalances

Marina Aleksandrovna BUSHUEVA, Natalya Masyuk
1 links
Economic Analysis Theory and Practice
Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
article

Supra-regional digital cluster as a tool for smoothing inter-regional imbalances

Marina Aleksandrovna BUSHUEVA, Natalya Masyuk
article en

Abstract

Subject. The impact of digital platforms on the spatial polarization of the Russian economy and the conditions under which they can weaken rather than strengthen interregional imbalances. Objectives. To conceptualize the supra-regional digital cluster as an independent object of regional policy and to show that the resulting impact of platform-cluster integration on territorial inequality is determined by the institutional configuration of the platform, and not by the properties of digital technologies as such. Methods. The method of theoretical synthesis is applied: the provisions of the concept of platform capitalism by N. Srnicek are compared with the model of cumulative causality and endogenous agglomeration, dating back to the works of G. Myrdal and P. Krugman. Additionally, a stylized bi-regional model of value added distribution was built, illustrating two multidirectional scenarios of platform integration. Results. A definition of a supra-regional digital cluster is proposed, distinguishing it from the classical geographically localized (Porter) model and from technological platforms as such. The thesis on the institutional ambivalence of platforms is formulated: the same technology reproduces and enhances agglomeration rents in metropolitan hubs with a centrally distributed design, and ensures network alignment with a federally distributed one. Four mechanisms of transferring the smoothing effect to the territory are revealed: production and cooperative, personnel and labor, technical and standardization, and infrastructural. The stylized example shows that the transition from the first design to the second is able to reduce the inter-regional gap in terms of specific effect by 18-24 percentage points, all other things being equal. Conclusions. The digital platform is not an automatic tool for regional alignment. The smoothing effect is achieved only if three institutional conditions are met: the presence of a distributed node architecture, formalized equality of regional participants in decision-making on platform development, and built-in rules for redistributing the added value created. Without these conditions, platform integration turns into a technologically mediated channel for extracting rent by the center from the periphery.

Economic Analysis Theory and PracticeVol. 25(10)
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (RU), Vladivostok State University (RU)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon