Knowing When to Use Automation: Task-Specific Expertise and GPS Engagement in a Navigational Task

As automated systems become increasingly embedded in everyday consumer technologies, understanding how individual differences shape engagement decisions is critical for supporting users. The present study examined how task-specific expertise influences engagement with an optional GPS assistant across fourteen trials in a simulated map-based navigation task. Ninety-one undergraduate participants were classified as navigational experts or novices by accuracy on a task-specific knowledge test of the simulated maps. As hypothesized, experts engaged the GPS significantly less than novices. Despite the difference in engagement, navigational accuracy did not significantly differ between groups, suggesting that novices engaged the GPS at rates that compensated for their lower expertise bringing their performance to comparable levels of experts. Post-hoc analyses revealed that poorer spatial orientation was associated with greater GPS engagement and lower navigational expertise. These findings suggest individuals may make calibrated and capability driven decisions about their automation engagement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813261498789
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowing When to Use Automation: Task-Specific Expertise and GPS Engagement in a Navigational Task

Colleen E. Patton, Jewel G. Padilla
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Knowing When to Use Automation: Task-Specific Expertise and GPS Engagement in a Navigational Task

Colleen E. Patton, Jewel G. Padilla
article en

Abstract

As automated systems become increasingly embedded in everyday consumer technologies, understanding how individual differences shape engagement decisions is critical for supporting users. The present study examined how task-specific expertise influences engagement with an optional GPS assistant across fourteen trials in a simulated map-based navigation task. Ninety-one undergraduate participants were classified as navigational experts or novices by accuracy on a task-specific knowledge test of the simulated maps. As hypothesized, experts engaged the GPS significantly less than novices. Despite the difference in engagement, navigational accuracy did not significantly differ between groups, suggesting that novices engaged the GPS at rates that compensated for their lower expertise bringing their performance to comparable levels of experts. Post-hoc analyses revealed that poorer spatial orientation was associated with greater GPS engagement and lower navigational expertise. These findings suggest individuals may make calibrated and capability driven decisions about their automation engagement.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
North Carolina State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Knowing When to Use Automation: Task-Specific Expertise and GPS Engagement in a Navigational Task — Colleen E. Patton, Jewel G. Padilla · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS