Iran’s Proxy Networks as Instruments of Regional Power: Ideology, Strategy, and Consequences in the Middle East

Since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, Iran has strategically co-opted a network of non-state armed actors across the Middle East. While existing scholarship itemizes these linkages, multifariously termed “proxy forces” or “the axis of resistance”, the constitutive logic underlying such alliances is undertheorized. This article maintains that Iran’s proxy networks are not opportunistic but establish a comprehensible grand strategy constituted by ideological affinity, emphasized threat perception, and asymmetric deterrence calculus. Based on multi-case study methodology including Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, and Yemen, and proceeding from foreign policy analysis and proxy warfare theory, the study scrutinizes the political, ideological, and financial mechanisms reinforcing these ties within Iran’s post-revolutionary security doctrine and its rivalry with the United States and Israel. The findings reveal that proxy deployment represents an asymmetric advantage authorizing power projection while diminishing direct military contact.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Politics and Security
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53451/ijps.1968357
Primary Topic
Middle East Politics and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Iran’s Proxy Networks as Instruments of Regional Power: Ideology, Strategy, and Consequences in the Middle East

Mohammad Pashayi
4 links
International Journal of Politics and Security
Middle East Politics and Society
article

Iran’s Proxy Networks as Instruments of Regional Power: Ideology, Strategy, and Consequences in the Middle East

Mohammad Pashayi
article en

Abstract

Since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, Iran has strategically co-opted a network of non-state armed actors across the Middle East. While existing scholarship itemizes these linkages, multifariously termed “proxy forces” or “the axis of resistance”, the constitutive logic underlying such alliances is undertheorized. This article maintains that Iran’s proxy networks are not opportunistic but establish a comprehensible grand strategy constituted by ideological affinity, emphasized threat perception, and asymmetric deterrence calculus. Based on multi-case study methodology including Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, and Yemen, and proceeding from foreign policy analysis and proxy warfare theory, the study scrutinizes the political, ideological, and financial mechanisms reinforcing these ties within Iran’s post-revolutionary security doctrine and its rivalry with the United States and Israel. The findings reveal that proxy deployment represents an asymmetric advantage authorizing power projection while diminishing direct military contact.

International Journal of Politics and SecurityVol. 8(2)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Middle East Politics and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon