Changes to task relevance in redundant motor environments distinguish structure learning from adaptation

Motor actions often exceed the dimensionality of task feedback, which creates control redundancy that requires learners to identify which movement dimensions influence task outcomes. The computations that shape learning in redundant tasks, especially when task-relevant spaces change, remain unclear. We studied this by combining established visuomotor perturbation approaches with a redundant motor interface reaching task. Two monkeys learned a 3D hand position to 2D cursor position mapping that allowed us to define and manipulate the task-relevant space. After animals learned an initial task-relevant space, we introduced two types of perturbations: Relevance Preserving (RP), which rotated hand-cursor relationships within the learned task relevant space, and Relevance Altering (RA), which altered the task relevant space. We hypothesized that RP perturbations would engage error-based adaptation (observed in non-redundant tasks), whereas RA perturbations would engage additional learning mechanisms associated with acquiring new skills. RP perturbations were learned rapidly during training (online) and generalized to the initial learned mapping, consistent with error-based adaptation. In contrast, adapting to the first RA perturbation took longer, engaged learning outside of training (offline), and did not generalize to the initial learned mapping. Animals also adapted faster across repeated exposures to new RA mappings and changed how they generated movements to learn each new mapping, consistent with computations associated with structure learning. These findings suggest that changing task relevance shifts motor learning from adaptation toward structure learning, which has implications for models of motor learning and sensorimotor therapies like brain-computer interfaces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.26.762093
Primary Topic
Motor Control and Adaptation
Type
preprint

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Changes to task relevance in redundant motor environments distinguish structure learning from adaptation

Pavithra Rajeswaran, Amy L. Orsborn, Leo R. Scholl, Lydia I. Smith
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Motor Control and Adaptation
preprint

Changes to task relevance in redundant motor environments distinguish structure learning from adaptation

Pavithra Rajeswaran, Amy L. Orsborn, Leo R. Scholl, Lydia I. Smith
preprint en

Abstract

Motor actions often exceed the dimensionality of task feedback, which creates control redundancy that requires learners to identify which movement dimensions influence task outcomes. The computations that shape learning in redundant tasks, especially when task-relevant spaces change, remain unclear. We studied this by combining established visuomotor perturbation approaches with a redundant motor interface reaching task. Two monkeys learned a 3D hand position to 2D cursor position mapping that allowed us to define and manipulate the task-relevant space. After animals learned an initial task-relevant space, we introduced two types of perturbations: Relevance Preserving (RP), which rotated hand-cursor relationships within the learned task relevant space, and Relevance Altering (RA), which altered the task relevant space. We hypothesized that RP perturbations would engage error-based adaptation (observed in non-redundant tasks), whereas RA perturbations would engage additional learning mechanisms associated with acquiring new skills. RP perturbations were learned rapidly during training (online) and generalized to the initial learned mapping, consistent with error-based adaptation. In contrast, adapting to the first RA perturbation took longer, engaged learning outside of training (offline), and did not generalize to the initial learned mapping. Animals also adapted faster across repeated exposures to new RA mappings and changed how they generated movements to learn each new mapping, consistent with computations associated with structure learning. These findings suggest that changing task relevance shifts motor learning from adaptation toward structure learning, which has implications for models of motor learning and sensorimotor therapies like brain-computer interfaces.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
University of Washington (US)
National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health, Office of Research Infrastructure Programs, National Institutes of Health
Motor Control and Adaptation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon