Development and feasibility testing of the taVNS adverse events questionnaire: a multistage methodological study

Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is a non-invasive neuromodulatory therapy gaining interest for its neural mechanisms and therapeutic effects. Although taVNS is considered safe, adverse event (AE) reporting remains inconsistent, lacking standardized procedures for assessment and documentation. This study aimed to develop a new instrument and conduct a preliminary evaluation of its use for systematic and structured assessment and reporting of AEs associated with taVNS. To achieve this objective, a multistage development process was undertaken, comprising: item generation, cognitive pretesting, pilot testing and translation into several languages. A targeted literature review of taVNS studies was performed to identify and categorize previously reported AEs and to form item generation. Based on these findings, a semi-structured taVNS Adverse Events Questionnaire (taVNS-AEQ) was developed. Its feasibility and usability were evaluated through cognitive pretesting and pilot testing in a randomized crossover study comparing active and sham taVNS. The literature search initially identified 203 records, of which 71 studies met the predefined eligibility criteria and were included in this review. Among these 71 studies, only 39 provided semi-structured AE data. A total of 539 individual AE symptoms were reported as absolute counts (19 studies), complemented by symptom data assessed using Likert-scales (20 studies), and were categorized for analysis and item generation. In a real-sham crossover study with 29 participants, the most frequent AEs were tingling, fatigue, and changes in concentration. The questionnaire demonstrated good feasibility, and after revisions version 3.0 was translated into four languages. The newly developed semi-structured taVNS-AEQ 3.0 includes four participant items, seven personnel items, and recommendations for documenting stimulation parameters. Current evidence on taVNS-related AEs is limited by the heterogeneous nature of the reporting. The taVNS-AEQ offers a newly developed semi-structured approach to AE assessment, potentially enhancing the quality and comparability of future taVNS studies.Systematic review registration: PROSPERO (Registration Number: CRD420251208237).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2026.1974496
Primary Topic
Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and feasibility testing of the taVNS adverse events questionnaire: a multistage methodological study

Karsten Witt, Till Bömmer, Katharina Meier, Luisa M. Schmidt
1 links
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
article

Development and feasibility testing of the taVNS adverse events questionnaire: a multistage methodological study

Karsten Witt, Till Bömmer, Katharina Meier, Luisa M. Schmidt
article en

Abstract

Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is a non-invasive neuromodulatory therapy gaining interest for its neural mechanisms and therapeutic effects. Although taVNS is considered safe, adverse event (AE) reporting remains inconsistent, lacking standardized procedures for assessment and documentation. This study aimed to develop a new instrument and conduct a preliminary evaluation of its use for systematic and structured assessment and reporting of AEs associated with taVNS. To achieve this objective, a multistage development process was undertaken, comprising: item generation, cognitive pretesting, pilot testing and translation into several languages. A targeted literature review of taVNS studies was performed to identify and categorize previously reported AEs and to form item generation. Based on these findings, a semi-structured taVNS Adverse Events Questionnaire (taVNS-AEQ) was developed. Its feasibility and usability were evaluated through cognitive pretesting and pilot testing in a randomized crossover study comparing active and sham taVNS. The literature search initially identified 203 records, of which 71 studies met the predefined eligibility criteria and were included in this review. Among these 71 studies, only 39 provided semi-structured AE data. A total of 539 individual AE symptoms were reported as absolute counts (19 studies), complemented by symptom data assessed using Likert-scales (20 studies), and were categorized for analysis and item generation. In a real-sham crossover study with 29 participants, the most frequent AEs were tingling, fatigue, and changes in concentration. The questionnaire demonstrated good feasibility, and after revisions version 3.0 was translated into four languages. The newly developed semi-structured taVNS-AEQ 3.0 includes four participant items, seven personnel items, and recommendations for documenting stimulation parameters. Current evidence on taVNS-related AEs is limited by the heterogeneous nature of the reporting. The taVNS-AEQ offers a newly developed semi-structured approach to AE assessment, potentially enhancing the quality and comparability of future taVNS studies.Systematic review registration: PROSPERO (Registration Number: CRD420251208237).

Frontiers in NeuroscienceVol. 20
Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon