Robot-Assisted Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Guided by Cortical Topography

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is widely used for functional brain mapping and neuromodulation, but conventional neuronavigation systems typically rely on simplified volumetric brain models that do not fully capture subject-specific cortical geometry. We developed and evaluated a novel cortical-topography-guided framework for improving TMS planning, coil alignment, and stimulation reliability. The framework integrates an enhanced head-MRI co-registration strategy based on the iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm using a three-dimensional cortical mesh reconstructed from structural MRI. This approach was designed to improve neuronavigation by more accurately aligning the participant's head with the MRI-derived cortical anatomy, thereby reducing co-registration error. Robot-assisted TMS (RA-TMS) was used to preserve the planned coil pose relative to cortical targets. Registration accuracy, coil alignment error, and motor-evoked potential (MEP) responses at the hand area of the primary motor cortex (M1) were evaluated and compared between RA-TMS and conventional manual TMS approach, which did not consistently preserve cortical topography-guided stimulation. ICP-based co-registration reduced the registration error between the head and MRI model from 5.83 ± 1.04 mm to 1.07 ± 0.03 mm. Compared with manual alignment, RA-TMS reduced translational error from 14.79 ± 8.03 mm to 5.22 ± 1.68 mm and rotational error from 7.01° ± 2.29° to 1.09° ± 0.33° (p < 0.001). RA-TMS also produced larger and more consistent MEP responses than manual TMS (0.27 ± 0.05 mV vs. 0.03 ± 0.01 mV, p < 0.001). Incorporating cortical topography-guided planning, combined with refined co-registration and robotic stabilization, improves coil alignment accuracy and the reliability of stimulation outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
medRxiv
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.25.26366449
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
preprint

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Robot-Assisted Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Guided by Cortical Topography

Dale Roberts, Amir Kheradmand, Mehran Armand, Jing Tian et al.
3 links
medRxiv
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
preprint

Robot-Assisted Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Guided by Cortical Topography

Dale Roberts, Amir Kheradmand, Mehran Armand, Jing Tian, Jiaming Zhang, Yihao Liu
preprint en

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is widely used for functional brain mapping and neuromodulation, but conventional neuronavigation systems typically rely on simplified volumetric brain models that do not fully capture subject-specific cortical geometry. We developed and evaluated a novel cortical-topography-guided framework for improving TMS planning, coil alignment, and stimulation reliability. The framework integrates an enhanced head-MRI co-registration strategy based on the iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm using a three-dimensional cortical mesh reconstructed from structural MRI. This approach was designed to improve neuronavigation by more accurately aligning the participant's head with the MRI-derived cortical anatomy, thereby reducing co-registration error. Robot-assisted TMS (RA-TMS) was used to preserve the planned coil pose relative to cortical targets. Registration accuracy, coil alignment error, and motor-evoked potential (MEP) responses at the hand area of the primary motor cortex (M1) were evaluated and compared between RA-TMS and conventional manual TMS approach, which did not consistently preserve cortical topography-guided stimulation. ICP-based co-registration reduced the registration error between the head and MRI model from 5.83 ± 1.04 mm to 1.07 ± 0.03 mm. Compared with manual alignment, RA-TMS reduced translational error from 14.79 ± 8.03 mm to 5.22 ± 1.68 mm and rotational error from 7.01° ± 2.29° to 1.09° ± 0.33° (p < 0.001). RA-TMS also produced larger and more consistent MEP responses than manual TMS (0.27 ± 0.05 mV vs. 0.03 ± 0.01 mV, p < 0.001). Incorporating cortical topography-guided planning, combined with refined co-registration and robotic stabilization, improves coil alignment accuracy and the reliability of stimulation outcomes.

medRxiv
Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US)
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders
Good health and well-being
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon