Learning by Sanctioning and Learning by Retaliation: Explaining The Evolution of the European Union’s Sanctions Regime Against Russia (2022–2026)

This article examines the twenty-one sanctions packages adopted by the European Union against Russia between February 2022 and July 2026 as a dynamic process of reciprocal learning rather than a sequence of isolated policy decisions. It argues that the EU’s learning by sanctioning and Russia’s learning by retaliation evolved through a mutually reinforcing causal cycle, with each side continuously adapting to the other’s actions. Integrating these two perspectives, the study develops a reciprocal-cycle framework that explains how sanctions and countermeasures co-evolved over time. The findings identify five evolutionary phases—Shock, War Economy, Technology Denial, Anti-Circumvention, and Strategic Attrition—and show that while sanctions failed to alter Russia’s short-term strategic objectives, they gradually weakened its economic, technological, and logistical capacities through cumulative adaptation and capacity erosion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Politics and Security
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53451/ijps.2004543
Primary Topic
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning by Sanctioning and Learning by Retaliation: Explaining The Evolution of the European Union’s Sanctions Regime Against Russia (2022–2026)

Tolga Kaya
1 links
International Journal of Politics and Security
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
article

Learning by Sanctioning and Learning by Retaliation: Explaining The Evolution of the European Union’s Sanctions Regime Against Russia (2022–2026)

Tolga Kaya
article en

Abstract

This article examines the twenty-one sanctions packages adopted by the European Union against Russia between February 2022 and July 2026 as a dynamic process of reciprocal learning rather than a sequence of isolated policy decisions. It argues that the EU’s learning by sanctioning and Russia’s learning by retaliation evolved through a mutually reinforcing causal cycle, with each side continuously adapting to the other’s actions. Integrating these two perspectives, the study develops a reciprocal-cycle framework that explains how sanctions and countermeasures co-evolved over time. The findings identify five evolutionary phases—Shock, War Economy, Technology Denial, Anti-Circumvention, and Strategic Attrition—and show that while sanctions failed to alter Russia’s short-term strategic objectives, they gradually weakened its economic, technological, and logistical capacities through cumulative adaptation and capacity erosion.

International Journal of Politics and SecurityVol. 8(2)
Ankara University (TR)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon