Contesting Europeanisation: everyday negotiations of Europe and LGBT rights in Serbia

This article examines how everyday understandings of Europe in Serbia shape public resistance to LGBT rights in the context of EU accession. Drawing on discourse analysis of user comments on online news articles about Belgrade Pride parades, it explores the ideational field within which European norms are interpreted and contested. Focusing on comments opposing Pride, we identify four recurring discursive registers – cultural, geographical, political, and technical – organised around two broader narrative schemas. Together, they portray Europe as simultaneously modern and corrupt, democratic and hypocritical, desirable and coercive. LGBT rights frequently emerge as symbols of Western domination, activating narratives of cultural exceptionalism and civilisational defence. We show how these schemas render resistance resilient to the very mechanisms through which accession seeks to promote compliance. This, we argue, demonstrates the need to centre everyday discourse and lived experience in understanding Europeanisation as a negotiated, rather than one-way, process of normative change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2026.2754892
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contesting Europeanisation: everyday negotiations of Europe and LGBT rights in Serbia

K. Slootmaeckers, T. Trost
Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies
European Union Policy and Governance
article

Contesting Europeanisation: everyday negotiations of Europe and LGBT rights in Serbia

K. Slootmaeckers, T. Trost
article en

Abstract

This article examines how everyday understandings of Europe in Serbia shape public resistance to LGBT rights in the context of EU accession. Drawing on discourse analysis of user comments on online news articles about Belgrade Pride parades, it explores the ideational field within which European norms are interpreted and contested. Focusing on comments opposing Pride, we identify four recurring discursive registers – cultural, geographical, political, and technical – organised around two broader narrative schemas. Together, they portray Europe as simultaneously modern and corrupt, democratic and hypocritical, desirable and coercive. LGBT rights frequently emerge as symbols of Western domination, activating narratives of cultural exceptionalism and civilisational defence. We show how these schemas render resistance resilient to the very mechanisms through which accession seeks to promote compliance. This, we argue, demonstrates the need to centre everyday discourse and lived experience in understanding Europeanisation as a negotiated, rather than one-way, process of normative change.

Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies
University of London (GB), University of Ljubljana (SI)
Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS
Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
European Union Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon